A case study in contesting the conventional wisdom: school-based fluoride mouthrinse programs in the USA.

This paper presents the events surrounding the dissemination of the results of a major preventive dentistry demonstration program designed and conducted to provide evidence of the effectiveness and actual costs of a combination of commonly used preventive procedures. It then reviews the controversy provoked when the results of that program were counter to the conventional wisdom of the day, prevailing national policy, and public health practice. An analysis of possible reasons for this reaction follows. The paper concludes with some observations about how such a situation might be approached to minimize similar controversy in the future.

[1]  P. Sheridan.  National Institute of Dental Research: 40 years of progress. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  H. Horowitz,et al.  Evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of fluoride mouthrinsing, fluoride tablets, and both procedures in combination: interim findings after two years. , 1987, Pediatric dentistry.

[3]  R. Bell,et al.  Conjecture versus empirical data: a response to concerns raised about the National Preventive Dentistry Demonstration Program. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[4]  T. Rebich.  Different strokes, regarding the NPDDP. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[5]  J. Bader,et al.  Fluoride mouthrinse programs in fluoridated communities. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  J. Bader,et al.  Effect of secular decline in caries on the evaluation of preventive dentistry demonstrations. , 1985, Journal of public health dentistry.

[7]  R. Bell,et al.  The cost and effectiveness of school-based preventive dental care. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[8]  T. Rebich.  School-based preventive dental care: a different view. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[9]  J. Stamm,et al.  The efficiency of caries prevention with weekly fluoride mouthrinses. , 1984, Journal of dental education.

[10]  A. J. Miller,et al.  A summary of the NIDR community caries prevention demonstration program. , 1983, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  L. Ripa,et al.  Supervised weekly rinsing with a 0.2 percent neutral NaF solution: final results of a demonstration program after six school years. , 1983, Journal of public health dentistry.

[12]  A. Horowitz,et al.  Caries-preventive effects of daily and weekly fluoride mouthrinsing in a fluoridated community: final results after 30 months. , 1982, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  S. Silverstein,et al.  Enrollment in and compliance with a community demonstration program of caries prevention for grades kindergarten through 12. , 1982, Journal of public health dentistry.

[14]  J. P. Carlos.  The prevention of dental caries: ten years later. , 1982, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  R. Glass.  Secular changes in caries prevalence in two Massachusetts towns. , 1981, Caries research.

[16]  J. A. Coombs,et al.  Policy research related to the diffusion of medical technologies. , 1980, Journal of dental education.

[17]  J. A. Coombs,et al.  Achievements of the seventies: self-applied fluorides. , 1980, Journal of public health dentistry.

[18]  W. Spitzer,et al.  Editorial Research priorities on prevention of chronic diseases , 1980 .

[19]  A. J. Conti,et al.  An evaluation of single and combined self-applied fluoride programs in schools. , 1976, Journal of public health dentistry.

[20]  S. Heifetz,et al.  The effect on dental caries of weekly rinsing with a neutral sodium fluoride or an acidulated phosphate-fluoride mouthwash. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[21]  B. McClendon,et al.  The effect on human dental caries of weekly oral rinsing with a sodium fluoride mouthwash: a final report. , 1971, Archives of oral biology.