A Cradle-to-Grave Multi-Pronged Methodology to Obtain the Carbon Footprint of Electro-Intensive Power Electronic Products

This paper proposes the application of a cradle-to-grave multi-pronged methodology to obtain a more realistic carbon footprint (CF) estimation of electro-intensive power electronic (EIPE) products. The literature review shows that methodologies for establishing CF have limitations in calculation or are not applied from the conception (cradle) to death (grave) of the product; therefore, this paper provides an extended methodology to overcome some limitations that can be applied in each stage during the life cycle assessment (LCA). The proposed methodology is applied in a cradle-to-grave scenario, being composed of two approaches of LCA: (1) an integrated hybrid approach based on an economic balance and (2) a standard approach based on ISO 14067 and PAS 2050 standards. The methodology is based on a multi-pronged assessment to combine conventional with hybrid techniques. The methodology was applied to a D-STATCOM prototype which contributes to the improvement of the efficiency. Results show that D-STATCOM considerably decreases CF and saves emissions taken place during the usage stage. A comparison was made between Sweden and China to establish the environmental impact of D-STATCOM in electrical networks, showing that saved emissions in the life cycle of D-STATCOM were 5.88 and 391.04 ton CO2eq in Sweden and China, respectively.

[1]  Nikhil Krishnan,et al.  A hybrid life cycle inventory of nano-scale semiconductor manufacturing. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  T. Wiedmann EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION , 2009 .

[3]  Bhanu Sood,et al.  Carbon footprinting of electronic products , 2014 .

[4]  S. Joshi Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[5]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Climate Benefits of Material Recycling : Inventory of Average Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Denmark, Norway and Sweden , 2015 .

[6]  Witold-Roger Poganietz,et al.  CO2 emissions of global metal-industries: The case of copper , 2007 .

[7]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[8]  S. Simon,et al.  Energy System Transitions in the Eastern Coastal Metropolitan Regions of China—The Role of Regional Policy Plans , 2019, Energies.

[9]  Kenichi Nakajima,et al.  Hybrid input-output approach to metal production and its application to the introduction of lead-free solders. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Integrated Planning for Regional Electric Power System Management with Risk Measure and Carbon Emission Constraints: A Case Study of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China , 2019 .

[11]  P. Tanskanen Management and recycling of electronic waste , 2013 .

[12]  R. Keefe,et al.  Carbon Footprint Estimation in Fiber Optics Industry: A Case Study of OFS Fitel, LLC , 2017 .

[13]  Wang Yanjia,et al.  The Chinese nonferrous metals industry—energy use and CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[14]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Economic-balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: case study of a laptop computer , 2011 .

[15]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Comparing Electrical Energy Storage Technologies Regarding Their Material and Carbon Footprint , 2018, Energies.

[16]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[17]  Shinichiro Fujimori,et al.  An assessment of near-to-mid-term economic impacts and energy transitions under "2°C" and "1.5°C" scenarios for India , 2018 .

[18]  Jean-Louis Scartezzini,et al.  Eco-Sim: A Parametric Tool to Evaluate the Environmental and Economic Feasibility of Decentralized Energy Systems , 2019, Energies.

[19]  A. Manzardo,et al.  Monitoring the carbon footprint of products: a methodological proposal , 2012 .