Effect of Dispersive Conductivity and Permittivity in Volume Conductor Models of Deep Brain Stimulation

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of dispersive tissue properties on the volume-conducted voltage waveforms and volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Inhomogeneous finite-element models were developed, incorporating a distributed dispersive electrode-tissue interface and encapsulation tissue of high and low conductivity, under both current-controlled and voltage-controlled stimulation. The models were used to assess the accuracy of capacitive models, where material properties were estimated at a single frequency, with respect to the full dispersive models. The effect of incorporating dispersion in the electrical conductivity and relative permittivity was found to depend on both the applied stimulus and the encapsulation tissue surrounding the electrode. Under current-controlled stimulation, and during voltage-controlled stimulation when the electrode was surrounded by high-resistivity encapsulation tissue, the dispersive material properties of the tissue were found to influence the voltage waveform in the tissue, indicated by RMS errors between the capacitive and dispersive models of 20%-38% at short pulse durations. When the dispersive model was approximated by a capacitive model, the accuracy of estimates of the volume of tissue activated was very sensitive to the frequency at which material properties were estimated. When material properties at 1 kHz were used, the error in the volume of tissue activated by capacitive approximations was reduced to -4.33% and 11.10%, respectively, for current-controlled and voltage-controlled stimulations, with higher errors observed when higher or lower frequencies were used.

[1]  R. Bayford,et al.  The influence of reactivity of the electrode–brain interface on the crossing electric current in therapeutic deep brain stimulation , 2008, Neuroscience.

[2]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  Madeleine M Lowery,et al.  Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  A fast method to derive realistic BEM models for E/MEG source reconstruction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[8]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  Effects of the electrical double layer and dispersive tissue properties in a volume conduction model of deep brain stimulation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  THE SPECIFIC IMPEDANCE OF THE DORSAL COLUMNS OF CAT: AN INISOTROPIC MEDIUM. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[10]  Svjetlana Miocinovic,et al.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[11]  Jaimie M. Henderson,et al.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[13]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[15]  Richard Bayford,et al.  Evaluating the impact of the deep brain stimulation induced electric field on subthalamic neurons: A computational modelling study , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Claudio Pollo,et al.  Influence of the implanted pulse generator as reference electrode in finite element model of monopolar deep brain stimulation , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Role of electrode design on the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  The NEURON Simulation Environment , 1997, Neural Computation.

[20]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Correlation between skull thickness asymmetry and scalp potential estimated by a numerical model of the head , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  A. Benabid,et al.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's Disease 1993 – 2003: where are we 10 years on? , 2004, British journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  E. T. McAdams,et al.  Harmonic analysis of low-frequency bioelectrode behavior , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Customizing deep brain stimulation to the patient using computational models , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Differences among implanted pulse generator waveforms cause variations in the neural response to deep brain stimulation , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Xuefeng F. Wei,et al.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Nada Yousif,et al.  Investigating the depth electrode–brain interface in deep brain stimulation using finite element models with graded complexity in structure and solution , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Finite-element time-domain algorithms for modeling linear Debye and Lorentz dielectric dispersions at low frequencies , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Carretera de Valencia,et al.  The finite element method in electromagnetics , 2000 .

[31]  Peter N Steinmetz,et al.  Assessing the direct effects of deep brain stimulation using embedded axon models , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[32]  Bart Nuttin,et al.  Chronaxie calculated from current–duration and voltage–duration data , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Incorporation of the electrode–electrolyte interface into finite-element models of metal microelectrodes , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[35]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[38]  C. McIntyre,et al.  How Does Deep Brain Stimulation Work? Present Understanding and Future Questions , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.