The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hilde Bosmans | Alistair Mackenzie | Julie Cooke | Lucy M Warren | Matthew G Wallis | Rosalind M Given-Wilson | David R Dance | Mark D Halling-Brown | Kenneth C Young | D. Dance | R. Given-Wilson | H. Bosmans | M. Wallis | M. Halling-Brown | K. Young | D. Chakraborty | L. Warren | Alistair Mackenzie | J. Cooke | Dev P Chakraborty
[1] S. Moss,et al. Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.
[2] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.
[3] Stephen L Hillis,et al. Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. , 2008, Academic radiology.
[4] D R Dance,et al. Validation of simulation of calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] Dev P Chakraborty,et al. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.
[6] Robert M. Nishikawa,et al. Radiologists’ Preferences for Digital Mammographic Display , 2000 .
[7] K. Berbaum,et al. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.
[8] E. Halpern,et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.
[9] Jing Xu,et al. Comparison of tissue equalization, and premium view post-processing methods in full field digital mammography. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[10] N. Obuchowski,et al. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] Dev P Chakraborty,et al. A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis. , 2013, Academic radiology.
[12] S. Ashley,et al. The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reporting. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.
[13] Ehsan Samei,et al. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.
[14] E. Samei,et al. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. , 2007, Medical physics.
[15] H. Honda,et al. Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: Comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters , 2010, Acta radiologica.
[16] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Increase in perceived case suspiciousness due to local contrast optimisation in digital screening mammography , 2011, European Radiology.
[17] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography. , 2009, Medical physics.
[18] D R Dance,et al. Comparison of the x-ray attenuation properties of breast calcifications, aluminium, hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[19] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. , 2003, Radiology.
[20] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Software Framework for Simulating Clusters of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammography , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.