Complexity challenges for transition policy: lessons from coastal shipping in Norway

[1]  M. Steen,et al.  Norwegian ship-owners' adoption of alternative fuels , 2022, Energy Policy.

[2]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Sustainability transitions in coastal shipping: The role of regime segmentation , 2021, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.

[3]  Markus M. Bugge,et al.  The role of regional innovation systems in mission-oriented innovation policy: exploring the problem-solution space in electrification of maritime transport , 2021, European Planning Studies.

[4]  Teis Hansen,et al.  Blending new and old in sustainability transitions: Technological alignment between fossil fuels and biofuels in Norwegian coastal shipping , 2021 .

[5]  Ann Elida Eide,et al.  Sustainability among Norwegian maritime firms: Green strategy and innovation as mediators of long‐term orientation and emission reduction , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[6]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Accelerating Low-Carbon Innovation , 2020 .

[7]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Implementing maritime battery-electric and hydrogen solutions: A technological innovation systems analysis , 2020, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[8]  Edurne Magro,et al.  Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies , 2019 .

[9]  F. Sager,et al.  Mapping the mix: Linking instruments, settings and target groups in the study of policy mixes , 2019 .

[10]  Bruno Turnheim,et al.  Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions , 2019, Research Policy.

[11]  J. Fagerberg.  Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy , 2018, Research Policy.

[12]  J. Schot,et al.  Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change , 2018, Research Policy.

[13]  Svein Gunnar Sjøtun.  A ferry making waves: A demonstration project ‘doing’ institutional work in a greening maritime industry , 2018, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography.

[14]  Jochen Markard,et al.  The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy , 2018, Nature Energy.

[15]  U. Hansen,et al.  Toward Technology-Sensitive Catching-Up Policies: Insights from Renewable Energy in China , 2017 .

[16]  Stephen John Pettit,et al.  Revisiting history: Can shipping achieve a second socio-technical transition for carbon emissions reduction? , 2017 .

[17]  A. Stromman,et al.  State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review , 2017 .

[18]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[19]  Anna Bergek,et al.  The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies , 2014 .

[20]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[21]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies , 2011 .

[22]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[23]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches , 2005 .

[24]  Allan Dahl Andersen,et al.  Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains , 2022, Research Policy.

[25]  Susanne Bauer,et al.  Retrofitting towards a greener marine shipping future: Reassembling ship fuels and liquefied natural gas in Norway , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.