Constraining effective field theories with machine learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
Gilles Louppe | Kyle Cranmer | Felix Kling | Alexander Held | Juan Pavez | Johann Brehmer | Irina Espejo | Gilles Louppe | K. Cranmer | J. Brehmer | J. Pavez | A. Held | F. Kling | Irina Espejo | Kyle Cranmer
[1] Pierre Baldi,et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics , 2016, The European Physical Journal C.
[2] D. Wyler,et al. Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation , 1986 .
[3] Gilles Louppe,et al. A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning , 2018, Physical Review D.
[4] K. Kondo. Dynamical Likelihood Method for Reconstruction of Events with Missing Momentum. I. Method and Toy Models , 1988 .
[5] Gilles Louppe,et al. Likelihood-free inference with an improved cross-entropy estimator , 2018, ArXiv.
[6] Peter Skands,et al. A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[7] Gilles Louppe,et al. Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers , 2015, 1506.02169.
[8] Gilles Louppe,et al. Mining for Dark Matter Substructure: Inferring Subhalo Population Properties from Strong Lenses with Machine Learning , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[9] J. Favereau,et al. DELPHES 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[10] K. Cranmer,et al. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.
[11] Natalia Gimelshein,et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.
[12] Gilles Louppe,et al. Identifying hadronically-decaying vector bosons and top quarks in ATLAS , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[13] O. Mattelaer. On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy , 2016, The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields.
[14] Steven Weinberg,et al. Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes , 1979 .
[15] Gilles Louppe,et al. Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[16] J. Brehmer,et al. Benchmarking simplified template cross sections in W H production , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[17] Gilles Louppe,et al. The frontier of simulation-based inference , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] M. Misiak,et al. Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian , 2010, 1008.4884.
[19] Gilles Louppe,et al. Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[20] P. Uwer,et al. Extending the Matrix Element Method beyond the Born approximation: calculating event weights at next-to-leading order accuracy , 2015, 1506.08798.
[21] K. Cranmer,et al. MadMiner: Machine Learning-Based Inference for Particle Physics , 2019, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[22] R. Frederix,et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.