Constraining effective field theories with machine learning

[1]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics , 2016, The European Physical Journal C.

[2]  D. Wyler,et al.  Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation , 1986 .

[3]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning , 2018, Physical Review D.

[4]  K. Kondo Dynamical Likelihood Method for Reconstruction of Events with Missing Momentum. I. Method and Toy Models , 1988 .

[5]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Likelihood-free inference with an improved cross-entropy estimator , 2018, ArXiv.

[6]  Peter Skands,et al.  A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[7]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers , 2015, 1506.02169.

[8]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Mining for Dark Matter Substructure: Inferring Subhalo Population Properties from Strong Lenses with Machine Learning , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[9]  J. Favereau,et al.  DELPHES 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[10]  K. Cranmer,et al.  Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.

[11]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[12]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Identifying hadronically-decaying vector bosons and top quarks in ATLAS , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[13]  O. Mattelaer On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy , 2016, The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields.

[14]  Steven Weinberg,et al.  Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes , 1979 .

[15]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[16]  J. Brehmer,et al.  Benchmarking simplified template cross sections in W H production , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[17]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  The frontier of simulation-based inference , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  M. Misiak,et al.  Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian , 2010, 1008.4884.

[19]  Gilles Louppe,et al.  Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  P. Uwer,et al.  Extending the Matrix Element Method beyond the Born approximation: calculating event weights at next-to-leading order accuracy , 2015, 1506.08798.

[21]  K. Cranmer,et al.  MadMiner: Machine Learning-Based Inference for Particle Physics , 2019, Computing and Software for Big Science.

[22]  R. Frederix,et al.  The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.