The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system

Tenure provides a permanent position to faculty in higher education institutions. In North America, it is granted to those who have established a record of excellence in research, teaching and services in a limited period. However, in China, research excellence (represented by the number of Web of Science publications) is highly weighted in the tenure assessment compared to excellence in teaching and services, but this has never been systematically investigated. By analyzing the tenure assessment documents from Chinese Universities, this study reveals the role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system and presents the landscape of the tenure assessment process in Chinese higher education institutions.

[1]  Mary Deane Sorcinelli,et al.  Can the Tenure Process Be Improved , 2009 .

[2]  Erin C McKiernan,et al.  Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.

[3]  Richard P. Chait.  Why Tenure? Why Now? , 2009 .

[4]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Impact Factor : A brief history , critique , and discussion of adverse effects , 2018 .

[5]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Vanishing industries and the rising monopoly of universities in published research , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  Executive Summary,et al.  Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary , 2010 .

[7]  Wang Ling-feng.  Tenure Track in American Institutions of Higher Learning:Its Post-war Change and Practice in China , 2013 .

[8]  Suzanne Pepper,et al.  China's Universities , 1982 .

[9]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Adele Paul-Hus,et al.  Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016) , 2017 .

[12]  R. Cagan.  The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[13]  Sharon Mcculloch,et al.  Hobson's choice: the effects of research evaluation on academics' writing practices in England , 2017, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[14]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[15]  QU Ming-feng.  A Case Study of Nanjing University:The Influence of Introducing SCI into Assessment System on the Quality of Basic Research in Mainland Chinese Universities , 2010 .

[16]  Fei Shu,et al.  Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016) , 2017, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  David Moher,et al.  Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure , 2018, PLoS biology.

[18]  Robert M. Diamond,et al.  Changing Priorities at Research Universities, 1991-1996. Based on: The National Study of Research Universities on the Balance between Research and Undergraduate Teaching (1992), by Peter J. Gray, Robert C. Froh, Robert M. Diammond. , 1998 .

[19]  中華人民共和国国家統計局.  China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[20]  M. Way,et al.  The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[21]  Cathy A. Trower.  What Is Current Policy , 2009 .

[22]  Juan Pablo Alperin,et al.  Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations , 2019, eLife.

[23]  Jie Zhang.  Developing excellence: Chinese university reform in three steps , 2014, Nature.

[24]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Evincing the Ratchet: A Thematic Analysis of the Promotion and Tenure Guidelines at a Striving University , 2014 .

[25]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences , 2009, Scientometrics.

[26]  Juan Pablo Alperin,et al.  How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? , 2019, eLife.