Integrating Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research with Patient Care.

Clinical trials of interventions in common practice can be built into the workflow of an electronic medical record. The authors review four such trials and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of this approach to gathering information.

[1]  W. Stewart,et al.  Ethics and Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research With Prospective Electronic Clinical Data , 2013, Medical care.

[2]  G. Bernard,et al.  Chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections: a randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  C. Wilder,et al.  Design considerations for point-of-care clinical trials comparing methadone and buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence in pregnancy and for neonatal abstinence syndrome. , 2014, Contemporary clinical trials.

[4]  Jorie M. Butler,et al.  Veterans Healthcare Administration providers’ attitudes and perceptions regarding pragmatic trials embedded at the point of care , 2014, Clinical Trials.

[5]  Joy Adamson,et al.  The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[6]  Johan van der Lei,et al.  A randomized database study in general practice yielded quality data but patient recruitment in routine consultation was not practical. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Steven Joffe,et al.  Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Leonard W. D'Avolio,et al.  A point-of-care clinical trial comparing insulin administered using a sliding scale versus a weight-based regimen , 2011, Clinical Trials (London, England).

[9]  Sergey Goryachev,et al.  Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' first point-of-care clinical trial , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..