Assessing Daily Evapotranspiration Methodologies from One-Time-of-Day sUAS and EC Information in the GRAPEX Project

Daily evapotranspiration (ET d ) plays a key role in irrigation water management and is particularly important in drought-stricken areas, such as California and high-value crops. Remote sensing allows for the cost-effective estimation of spatial evapotranspiration (ET), and the advent of small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) technology has made it possible to estimate instantaneous high-resolution ET at the plant, row, and subfield scales. sUAS estimates ET using "instantaneous" remote sensing measurements with half-hourly/hourly forcing micrometeorological data, yielding hourly fluxes in W/m2 that are then translated to a daily scale (mm/day) under two assumptions: (a) relative rates, such as the ratios of ET-to-net radiation (R n ) or ET-to-solar radiation (R s ), are assumed to be constant rather than absolute, and (b) nighttime evaporation (E) and transpiration (T) contributions are negligible. While assumption (a) may be reasonable for unstressed, full cover crops (no exposed soil), the E and T rates may significantly vary over the course of the day for partially vegetated cover conditions due to diurnal variations of soil and crop temperatures and interactions between soil and vegetation elements in agricultural environments, such as vineyards and orchards. In this study, five existing extrapolation approaches that compute the daily ET from the "instantaneous" remotely sensed sUAS ET estimates and the eddy covariance (EC) flux tower measurements were evaluated under different weather, grapevine variety, and trellis designs. Per assumption (b), the nighttime ET contribution was ignored. Each extrapolation technique (evaporative fraction (EF), solar radiation (R s ), net radiation-to-solar radiation (R n /R s ) ratio, Gaussian (GA), and Sine) makes use of clear skies and quasi-sinusoidal diurnal variations of hourly ET and other meteorological parameters. The sUAS ET estimates and EC ET measurements were collected over multiple years and times from different vineyard sites in California as part of the USDA Agricultural Research Service Grape Remote Sensing Atmospheric Profile and Evapotranspiration eXperiment (GRAPEX). Optical and thermal sUAS imagery data at 10 cm and 60 cm, respectively, were collected by the Utah State University AggieAir sUAS Program and used in the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model to estimate the instantaneous or hourly sUAS ET at overpass time. The hourly ET from the EC measurements was also used to validate the extrapolation techniques. Overall, the analysis using EC measurements indicates that the R s , EF, and GA approaches presented the best goodness-of-fit statistics for a window of time between 1030 and 1330 PST (Pacific Standard Time), with the R s approach yielding better agreement with the EC measurements. Similar results were found using TSEB and sUAS data. The 1030-1330 time window also provided the greatest agreement between the actual daily EC ET and the extrapolated TSEB daily ET, with the R s approach again yielding better agreement with the ground measurements. The expected accuracy of the upscaled TSEB daily ET estimates across all vineyard sites in California is below 0.5 mm/day, (EC extrapolation accuracy was found to be 0.34 mm/day), making the daily scale results from TSEB reliable and suitable for day-to-day water management applications.

[1]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Upscaling of evapotranspiration fluxes from instantaneous to daytime scales for thermal remote sensing applications , 2013 .

[2]  Renhua Zhang,et al.  Based on the Gaussian Fitting Method to Derive Daily Evapotranspiration from Remotely Sensed Instantaneous Evapotranspiration , 2019, Advances in Meteorology.

[3]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Analysis of evaporative fraction diurnal behaviour , 2007 .

[4]  Mac McKee,et al.  Spatial Scale Gap Filling Using an Unmanned Aerial System: A Statistical Downscaling Method for Applications in Precision Agriculture , 2017, Sensors.

[5]  R. Crago,et al.  Comparison of the Evaporative Fraction and the Priestley‐Taylor α for Parameterizing Daytime Evaporation , 1996 .

[6]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Crop Water Stress Index of an irrigated vineyard in the Central Valley of California , 2018, Irrigation Science.

[7]  J. Kondo,et al.  Sensible Heat Flux from the Earth's Surface under Natural Convective Conditions. , 1997 .

[8]  J. Norman,et al.  Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature , 1995 .

[9]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Revisiting the paper “Using radiometric surface temperature for surface energy flux estimation in Mediterranean drylands from a two-source perspective” , 2016 .

[10]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery , 2011 .

[11]  Ling Tong,et al.  Variability in energy partitioning and resistance parameters for a vineyard in northwest China , 2009 .

[12]  J. Norman,et al.  Surface flux estimation using radiometric temperature: A dual‐temperature‐difference method to minimize measurement errors , 2000 .

[13]  Anthony Morse,et al.  A Landsat-based energy balance and evapotranspiration model in Western US water rights regulation and planning , 2005 .

[14]  R. Crago,et al.  Conservation and variability of the evaporative fraction during the daytime , 1996 .

[15]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources , 2012 .

[16]  C. Acevedo,et al.  Latent heat flux over Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard using the Shuttleworth and Wallace model , 2006, Irrigation Science.

[17]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  System of Systems Model for Analysis of Biofuel Development , 2015 .

[18]  Alfonso F. Torres-Rua,et al.  Vicarious Calibration of sUAS Microbolometer Temperature Imagery for Estimation of Radiometric Land Surface Temperature , 2017, Sensors.

[19]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A data fusion approach for mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scale , 2013 .

[20]  W. Kustas,et al.  Soil water content estimation using a remote sensing based hybrid evapotranspiration modeling approach , 2012 .

[21]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Vineyard evaporative fraction based on eddy covariance in an arid desert region of Northwest China , 2008 .

[22]  Hector Nieto,et al.  Influence of wind direction on the surface roughness of vineyards , 2018, Irrigation science.

[23]  Richard Crago,et al.  Hourly and daytime evapotranspiration from grassland using radiometric surface temperatures , 2004 .

[24]  Feng Gao,et al.  A Data Mining Approach for Sharpening Thermal Satellite Imagery over Land , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Ayman Nassar,et al.  Influence of Model Grid Size on the Estimation of Surface Fluxes Using the Two Source Energy Balance Model and sUAS Imagery in Vineyards , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[26]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Variability in soil heat flux from a mesquite dune site , 2000 .

[27]  Dong Wang,et al.  Evapotranspiration Estimation with UAVs in Agriculture: A Review , 2019 .

[28]  Albert Olioso,et al.  Reconstruction of temporal variations of evapotranspiration using instantaneous estimates at the time of satellite overpass , 2012 .

[29]  H. Schmid,et al.  A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP) , 2015 .

[30]  Feng Gao,et al.  THE GRAPE REMOTE SENSING ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EXPERIMENT. , 2018, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[31]  W. Kustas,et al.  An intercomparison of radiation partitioning models in vineyard canopies , 2019, Irrigation Science.

[32]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Aspects of bulk atmospheric boundary layer similarity under free‐convective conditions , 1999 .

[33]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping evapotranspiration with high-resolution aircraft imagery over vineyards using one- and two-source modeling schemes , 2015 .

[34]  Lisheng Song,et al.  Evaluation of TSEB turbulent fluxes using different methods for the retrieval of soil and canopy component temperatures from UAV thermal and multispectral imagery , 2018, Irrigation Science.

[35]  Ray D. Jackson,et al.  Estimation of Daily Evapotranspiration from one Time-of-Day Measurements , 1983 .

[36]  Feng Gao,et al.  Impact of different within-canopy wind attenuation formulations on modelling sensible heat flux using TSEB , 2018, Irrigation Science.

[37]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Using high-spatiotemporal thermal satellite ET retrievals to monitor water use over California vineyards of different climate, vine variety and trellis design , 2020 .

[38]  William P. Kustas,et al.  A two‐source approach for estimating turbulent fluxes using multiple angle thermal infrared observations , 1997 .

[39]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Daily evapotranspiration estimates from extrapolating instantaneous airborne remote sensing ET values , 2008, Irrigation Science.

[40]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Monitoring daily evapotranspiration over two California vineyards using Landsat 8 in a multi-sensor data fusion approach , 2016 .

[41]  Yi Liu,et al.  Improving Estimation of Cropland Evapotranspiration by the Bayesian Model Averaging Method with Surface Energy Balance Models , 2019, Atmosphere.

[42]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Comparison of five models to scale daily evapotranspiration from one-time-of-day measurements , 2006 .

[43]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A decadal (2008–2017) daily evapotranspiration data set of 1 km spatial resolution and spatial completeness across the North China Plain using TSEB and data fusion , 2021 .

[44]  Ronglin Tang,et al.  Estimation of Daily Evapotranspiration Using Instantaneous Decoupling Coefficient From the MODIS and Field Data , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[45]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scales over rainfed and irrigated agricultural areas using remote sensing data fusion , 2014 .

[46]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Nighttime Evapotranspiration from Alfalfa and Cotton in a Semiarid Climate , 2006 .

[47]  Richard L. Snyder,et al.  A review of models and micrometeorological methods used to estimate wetland evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[48]  Panagiotis G. Sarigiannidis,et al.  A Review on UAV-Based Applications for Precision Agriculture , 2019, Inf..

[49]  Gilles Boulet,et al.  Deriving daily evapotranspiration from remotely sensed instantaneous evaporative fraction over olive orchard in semi-arid Morocco , 2008 .

[50]  Fubao Sun,et al.  New analytical derivation of the mean annual water‐energy balance equation , 2008 .

[51]  D. Smart,et al.  Estimation of actual evapotranspiration in winegrape vineyards located on hillside terrain using surface renewal analysis , 2012, Irrigation Science.

[52]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Evaluating the two-source energy balance model using local thermal and surface flux observations in a strongly advective irrigated agricultural area , 2012 .

[53]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Upscaling latent heat flux for thermal remote sensing studies: Comparison of alternative approaches and correction of bias , 2012 .

[54]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of daily evapotranspiration estimates from instantaneous measurements , 1995 .

[55]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Daily evaporation over a region from lower boundary layer profiles measured with radiosondes , 1991 .

[56]  G. Kiely,et al.  Upscaling instantaneous to daily evapotranspiration using modelled daily shortwave radiation for remote sensing applications: an artificial neural network approach , 2016 .

[57]  Daoyi Chen,et al.  Diurnal Variation of Surface Fluxes During Thorough Drying (or Severe Drought) of Natural Prairie , 1996 .

[58]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Using High-Spatiotemporal Thermal Satellite ET Retrievals for Operational Water Use and Stress Monitoring in a California Vineyard , 2019, Remote. Sens..