MEASURING TRANSIT SIGNAL RECOVERY IN THE KEPLER PIPELINE. III. COMPLETENESS OF THE Q1–Q17 DR24 PLANET CANDIDATE CATALOG WITH IMPORTANT CAVEATS FOR OCCURRENCE RATE CALCULATIONS

With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (>40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline. We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.

[1]  Aisey M Andel.  ANALYTIC LIGHTCURVES FOR PLANETARY TRANSIT SEARCHES , 2002 .

[2]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. VI. PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1–Q16 (47 MONTHS) , 2015, 1502.02038.

[3]  M. R. Haas,et al.  TERRESTRIAL PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES FOR THE KEPLER GK DWARF SAMPLE , 2015, 1506.04175.

[4]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  χ2 DISCRIMINATORS FOR TRANSITING PLANET DETECTION IN KEPLER DATA , 2012, 1302.7029.

[5]  Jon M. Jenkins,et al.  The Impact of Solar-like Variability on the Detectability of Transiting Terrestrial Planets , 2002 .

[6]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning II - A Bayesian Approach to Systematic Error Correction , 2012, 1203.1383.

[7]  Jon M. Jenkins,et al.  Kepler Planet Detection Metrics: Statistical Bootstrap Test , 2016 .

[8]  K. von Braun,et al.  The NASA Exoplanet Archive: Data and Tools for Exoplanet Research , 2013, 1307.2944.

[9]  M. R. Haas,et al.  A MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUE TO IDENTIFY TRANSIT SHAPED SIGNALS , 2015, 1509.00041.

[10]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  Identification of Background False Positives from Kepler Data , 2013, 1303.0052.

[11]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  Photometric analysis in the Kepler Science Operations Center pipeline , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  Jon M. Jenkins,et al.  MEASURING TRANSIT SIGNAL RECOVERY IN THE KEPLER PIPELINE. I. INDIVIDUAL EVENTS , 2013, 1303.0255.

[13]  Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak,et al.  Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning I—Architecture and Algorithms for Error Correction in Kepler Light Curves , 2012, 1203.1382.

[14]  Stephen R. Kane,et al.  ON THE FREQUENCY OF POTENTIAL VENUS ANALOGS FROM KEPLER DATA , 2014, 1409.2886.

[15]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  Multiscale Systematic Error Correction via Wavelet-Based Bandsplitting in Kepler Data , 2014 .

[16]  Bruce D. Clarke,et al.  Identifying False Alarms in the Kepler Planet Candidate Catalog , 2016, 1602.03204.

[17]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  DETECTION OF POTENTIAL TRANSIT SIGNALS IN THE FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF Kepler MISSION DATA , 2012, 1201.1048.

[18]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  The Derivation, Properties, and Value of Kepler’s Combined Differential Photometric Precision , 2012, 1208.0595.

[19]  Roger C. Hunter,et al.  Detection of Potential Transit Signals in 16 Quarters of Kepler Mission Data , 2013 .

[20]  Hema Chandrasekaran,et al.  Pixel-level calibration in the Kepler Science Operations Center pipeline , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[21]  T. Guillot,et al.  SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates XVII. The physical properties of giant exoplanets within 400 days of period , 2015, 1511.00643.

[22]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. VII. THE FIRST FULLY UNIFORM CATALOG BASED ON THE ENTIRE 48-MONTH DATA SET (Q1–Q17 DR24) , 2015, 1512.06149.

[23]  E. Agol,et al.  Analytic Light Curves for Planetary Transit Searches , 2002, astro-ph/0210099.

[24]  M. R. Haas,et al.  CONTAMINATION IN THE KEPLER FIELD. IDENTIFICATION OF 685 KOIs AS FALSE POSITIVES VIA EPHEMERIS MATCHING BASED ON Q1–Q12 DATA , 2014, 1401.1240.

[25]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  DETECTION OF POTENTIAL TRANSIT SIGNALS IN 16 QUARTERS OF KEPLER MISSION DATA , 2013, 1501.03586.

[26]  Jon M. Jenkins,et al.  MEASURING TRANSIT SIGNAL RECOVERY IN THE KEPLER PIPELINE. II. DETECTION EFFICIENCY AS CALCULATED IN ONE YEAR OF DATA , 2015, 1507.05097.

[27]  M. R. Haas,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE KEPLER SCIENCE PROCESSING PIPELINE , 2010, 1001.0258.

[28]  Jie Li,et al.  Transiting planet search in the Kepler pipeline , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[29]  D. Charbonneau,et al.  THE OCCURRENCE OF POTENTIALLY HABITABLE PLANETS ORBITING M DWARFS ESTIMATED FROM THE FULL KEPLER DATASET AND AN EMPIRICAL MEASUREMENT OF THE DETECTION SENSITIVITY , 2015, 1501.01623.

[30]  Jie Li,et al.  Data validation in the Kepler Science Operations Center pipeline , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[31]  C. Henze,et al.  DISCOVERY AND VALIDATION OF Kepler-452b: A 1.6 R⨁ SUPER EARTH EXOPLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A G2 STAR , 2015, 1507.06723.