Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems

We present a formal theory of contextuality for a set of random variables grouped into different subsets (contexts) corresponding to different, mutually incompatible conditions. Within each context the random variables are jointly distributed, but across different contexts they are stochastically unrelated. The theory of contextuality is based on the analysis of the extent to which some of these random variables can be viewed as preserving their identity across different contexts when one considers all possible joint distributions imposed on the entire set of the random variables. We illustrate the theory on three systems of traditional interest in quantum physics (and also in non-physical, e.g., behavioral studies). These are systems of the Klyachko-type, Bell-type, and Leggett-Garg-type. Listed in this order, each of them is formally a special case of the previous one. For each of them we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for contextuality while allowing for experimental errors and contextual biases or signaling. Based on the same principles that underly these derivations we also propose a measure for the degree of contextuality and compute it for the three systems in question.

[1]  N. Gisin,et al.  General properties of nonsignaling theories , 2005, quant-ph/0508016.

[2]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Random Variables Recorded under Mutually Exclusive Conditions: Contextuality-by-Default , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  The Joint Distribution Criterion and the Distance Tests for Selective Probabilistic Causality , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[4]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Order-distance and other metric-like functions on jointly distributed random variables , 2011, ArXiv.

[5]  F. Gonseth,et al.  DIE LOGIK NICHT GLEICHZEITIG ENTSCHEIDBARER AUSSAGEN , 1990 .

[6]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  When are Probabilistic Explanations Possible , 1981 .

[7]  Jose L. Cereceda.  QUANTUM MECHANICAL PROBABILITIES AND GENERAL PROBABILISTIC CONSTRAINTS FOR EINSTEIN–PODOLSKY–ROSEN–BOHM EXPERIMENTS , 2000 .

[8]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Leggett-Garg Inequalities, Pilot Waves and Contextuality , 2014, 1409.4104.

[9]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  No-Forcing and No-Matching Theorems for Classical Probability Applied to Quantum Mechanics , 2014 .

[10]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[11]  M. A. Can,et al.  Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  Jan-Ake Larsson.  A Kochen-Specker inequality , 2002 .

[13]  Karl Svozil,et al.  How much contextuality? , 2011, Natural Computing.

[14]  M. Horne,et al.  Experimental Consequences of Objective Local Theories , 1974 .

[15]  Garg,et al.  Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? , 1985, Physical review letters.

[16]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Probabilistic Contextuality in EPR/Bohm-type Systems with Signaling Allowed , 2014, 1406.0243.

[17]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[19]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  A Qualified Kolmogorovian Account of Probabilistic Contextuality , 2013, QI.

[20]  Janne Kujala,et al.  Probability, Random Variables, and Selectivity , 2013, 1312.2239.

[21]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  All-Possible-Couplings Approach to Measuring Probabilistic Context , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Generalizing Bell-type and Leggett-Garg-type Inequalities to Systems with Signaling , 2014, 1407.2886.

[23]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Measuring Observable Quantum Contextuality , 2015, QI.

[24]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .