On-Orbit Assembly Strategies for Next-Generation Space Exploration

As the world looks ahead to the next generation of space exploration programs, we must focus on designing architectures for both sustainability and affordability. By viewing exploration programs as a “system-of-systems,” we can focus on reducing costs through the use of flexible, reusable infrastructures to support various aspects of manned and unmanned spaceflight. This paper addresses one key aspect of affordable exploration programs by tackling the issue of high costs for access to space. While launch vehicle trades for exploration programs are relatively well understood, on-orbit assembly has been given much less attention, but is an equally important component of the infrastructure enabling human access to space. This paper explores a number of on-orbit assembly methods for modular spacecraft, in order to understand the potential value of a reusable assembly support infrastructure. Four separate assembly strategies involving module self-assembly, tug-based assembly, and in-space refueling are modeled and compared in terms of mass-to-orbit requirements for various on-orbit assembly tasks. Results show that the assembly strategy has a significant impact on overall launch mass, and reusable space tugs with in-space refueling can significantly reduce the required launch mass for on-orbit assembly.

[1]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Optimal Launch Vehicle Size Determination for Moon-Mars Transportation Architectures , 2005 .

[2]  R. M. Muller Assembly and servicing of a large telescope at the International Space Station , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[3]  F. Shahrokhi,et al.  The Techniques of Manned On-Orbit Assembly , 1988 .

[4]  W. Doggett,et al.  Robotic assembly of truss structures for space systems and future research plans , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  George Morgenthaler A cost trade-off model for on-orbit assembly logistics , 1991 .

[6]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[7]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Space Systems Flexibility Provided by On-Orbit Servicing: Part 2 , 2002 .

[8]  Vance D. Brand The challenge of assembling a space station in orbit , 1990 .

[9]  Hugh McManus,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ORBITAL TRANSFER VEHICLE TRADE SPACE , 2003 .

[10]  Timothy E. Rumford Demonstration of autonomous rendezvous technology (DART) project summary , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Architecting a family of space tugs based on orbital transfer mission scenarios , 2003 .

[12]  David L. Akin,et al.  EVA, robotic, and cooperative assembly of large space structures , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[13]  Danny Hand Integrated Crew Exploration and Base Assembly System (ICEBAS) for Moon/Mars/Beyond (MMB) Missions , 2005 .

[14]  Samuel B. Wilson,et al.  DARPA Orbital Express program: effecting a revolution in space-based systems , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[15]  L. R. Purves A method for estimating costs and benefits of space assembly and servicing by astronauts and robots , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Result and evaluation of autonomous rendezvous docking experiment of ETS-VII , 1999 .

[17]  Douglas J. Zimpfer,et al.  Autonomous Rendezvous, Capture and In-Space Assembly: Past, Present and Future , 2005 .

[18]  Trina M. Chytka,et al.  Analysis of In-Space Assembly of Modular Systems , 2005 .