Enhancement of Mentor Selection Using the Ideal Mentor Scale

Doctoral students seeking faculty mentors have few tools available to assist them. The Ideal Mentor Scale (IMS) is a new measure designed to help graduate students consider the qualities they as individuals most value in a potential mentor. Ph.D. students at 3 different universities (Ns = 82, 250, 380) contributed to the development and cross-validation of the 34-item IMS. Item frequencies indicated that 2 universal qualities were central to graduate students' definitions of a mentor: communication skills and provision of feedback. Principal factor analysis of the IMS indicated that 3 individual differences dimensions reliably underlaid graduate students' importance ratings of mentor attributes: Integrity, Guidance, and Relationship. In one sample, Guidance and Relationship were significantly related to student satisfaction with their mentor. The IMS is an assessment tool that could individualize the initiation and maintenance of mentoring relationships, enhance communication, and ultimately improve the satisfaction of students with their doctoral education.

[1]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Scholars in the Making. The Development of Graduate and Professional Students. , 1976 .

[2]  Lucia A. Gilbert,et al.  Dimensions of same-gender student-faculty role-model relationships , 1985 .

[3]  K. Kram.  Phases of the mentor relationship. , 1983 .

[4]  B. R. Ragins,et al.  The Effects of Sex and Gender Role Orientation on Mentorship in Male-Dominated Occupations. , 1993 .

[5]  J. Loevinger.  Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory , 1957 .

[6]  Larry D. Burlew.  Multiple mentor model: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[7]  R. Brown,et al.  Social Psychology, 2nd Ed , 1965 .

[8]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  SUPERVISORY MENTORING BY ADVISERS: RELATIONSHIPS WITH DOCTORAL STUDENT POTENTIAL, PRODUCTIVITY, AND COMMITMENT , 1995 .

[9]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[10]  Eugene M. Anderson,et al.  Toward a Conceptualization of Mentoring , 1988 .

[11]  D. Levinson,et al.  Seasons of a man's life , 1978 .

[12]  Judith W. Busch.  Mentoring in Graduate Schools of Education: Mentors’ Perceptions , 1985 .

[13]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[14]  Bob Boice,et al.  Systematic Mentoring for New Faculty Teachers and Graduate Teaching Assistants , 1998 .

[15]  Jae-on Kim,et al.  Introduction to Factor Analysis , 1978 .

[16]  Ian L. Cesa,et al.  A Method for Encouraging the Development of Good Mentor-Protégé Relationships , 1989 .

[17]  Wilde Busch Judith,et al.  Mentoring in Graduate Schools of Education , 1991 .

[18]  R. Noe.  An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships , 1988 .

[19]  Maryann Jacobi.  Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review , 1991 .

[20]  S. Aguilar-Gaxiola.  The Roles of Mentors in the Lives of Graduate Students. , 1984 .

[21]  W. Davidson,et al.  Students' Views of Mentors in Psychology Graduate Training , 1986 .

[22]  G. Roberts,et al.  To Compete or to Educate? Mentoring and the Research Climate , 1995 .

[23]  G. Sorenson,et al.  Conflicts between Doctoral Candidates and Their Sponsors: A Contrast in Expectations , 1967 .

[24]  D. R. Saunders.  Book Reviews : Fruchter, Benjamin. Introduction to Factor Analysis. New York: Van Nostrand, I954. xii + 280 pp. ($5.00 , 1955 .

[25]  J E Everett,et al.  Factor Comparability As A Means Of Determining The Number Of Factors And Their Rotation. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  B. Fruchter,et al.  Introduction to Factor Analysis , 1955 .

[27]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[28]  Josann Duane,et al.  Faculty Mentoring Faculty in a Public University , 1991 .

[29]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. , 1988 .