Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury Enhanced by Strengthening Corticospinal Synaptic Transmission

The corticospinal tract is an important target for motor recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) in animals and humans. Voluntary motor output depends on the efficacy of synapses between corticospinal axons and spinal motoneurons, which can be modulated by the precise timing of neuronal spikes. Using noninvasive techniques, we developed tailored protocols for precise timing of the arrival of descending and peripheral volleys at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses of an intrinsic finger muscle in humans with chronic incomplete SCI. We found that arrival of presynaptic volleys prior to motoneuron discharge enhanced corticospinal transmission and hand voluntary motor output. The reverse order of volley arrival and sham stimulation did not affect or decreased voluntary motor output and electrophysiological outcomes. These findings are the first demonstration that spike timing-dependent plasticity of residual corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses provides a mechanism to improve motor function after SCI. Modulation of residual corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses may present a novel therapeutic target for enhancing voluntary motor output in motor disorders affecting the corticospinal tract.

[1]  D. Burke,et al.  Motoneuron excitability and the F wave , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Kossev,et al.  F waves and motor unit size , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  D. Linden The Return of the Spike Postsynaptic Action Potentials and the Induction of LTP and LTD , 1999, Neuron.

[5]  S. Micera,et al.  Restoring Voluntary Control of Locomotion after Paralyzing Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, Science.

[6]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Nicolas Caesar Petersen,et al.  Probing the corticospinal link between the motor cortex and motoneurones: some neglected aspects of human motor cortical function , 2010, Acta physiologica.

[8]  S. Beck,et al.  Pathway‐specific plasticity in the human spinal cord , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  H. Hultborn,et al.  H‐reflexes and F‐responses are not equally sensitive to changes in motoneuronal excitability , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  Jonathan T. Brown,et al.  Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2011 , 2011 .

[11]  J. Broton,et al.  Latency of changes in spinal motoneuron excitability evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in spinal cord injured individuals. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  A. Thompson,et al.  Repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation increases ankle dorsiflexor motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord lesions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M Crawford,et al.  Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  K J Klose,et al.  Distribution and latency of muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after spinal cord injury in humans. , 1999, Journal of neurotrauma.

[15]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Is presynaptic inhibition distributed to corticospinal fibres in man? , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Adam R. Ferguson,et al.  Extensive Spontaneous Plasticity of Corticospinal Projections After Primate Spinal Cord Injury , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Fouad,et al.  Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses , 2001, Current Biology.

[18]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Development of quantitative and sensitive assessments of physiological and functional outcome during recovery from spinal cord injury: A Clinical Initiative , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[22]  C. J. Mathias,et al.  Action of 5Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on sensory, motor and autonomic function in human spinal cord injury , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Robert Chen,et al.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Christine K. Thomas,et al.  Effects of sustained stimulation on the excitability of motoneurons innervating paralyzed and control muscles. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  P. Strick,et al.  Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: an anatomical perspective. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Oudega,et al.  Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[29]  N. Davey,et al.  Comparison of input-output patterns in the corticospinal system of normal subjects and incomplete spinal cord injured patients , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Nicolas Caesar Petersen,et al.  Evidence favouring different descending pathways to soleus motoneurones activated by magnetic brain stimulation in man. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spinal associative stimulation: A non-invasive stimulation paradigm to modulate spinal excitability , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  K. Bunday,et al.  Impaired crossed facilitation of the corticospinal pathway after cervical spinal cord injury. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  H reflex modulation by transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinal cord injury subjects after gait training with electromechanical systems , 2010, Spinal Cord.

[34]  Jaynie F. Yang,et al.  Afferent regulation of leg motor cortex excitability after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  David Burke,et al.  The Circuitry of the Human Spinal Cord: Monosynaptic Ia Excitation, Homosynaptic Depression and Transcortical Ia Excitation , 2012 .

[36]  R. Lemon Descending pathways in motor control. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Bernard A Conway,et al.  Impaired transmission in the corticospinal tract and gait disability in spinal cord injured persons. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits , 2004, Neuron.

[39]  R. Johansson,et al.  Incidence of F waves in single human thenar motor units , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[40]  R. Nashmi,et al.  Changes in axonal physiology and morphology after chronic compressive injury of the rat thoracic spinal cord , 2001, Neuroscience.

[41]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Voluntary Motor Output Is Altered by Spike-Timing-Dependent Changes in the Human Corticospinal Pathway , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.