Comprehensive performance evaluation of distributed and dynamic mobility routing strategy

In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance study of distributed and dynamic mobility management (DDMM). DDMM presents a new architectural paradigm for a sustainable mobile networking against an ever-increasing amount of Internet data traffic, providing IP mobility management with distributed deployment of mobility anchors and dynamic activation when mobility is needed. Such a distributed mobility management concept is generally and intuitively accepted in terms of effective distribution of mobile traffic when compared with centralized mobility management (CMM) approaches. Nevertheless, the routing strategy of DDMM has not yet been properly examined through performance studies, and especially the impact of potential mobility routing strategies on the user plane is an open question. We perform a mathematical analysis of DDMM and present numerical results aiming to identify in which conditions, by which factors, and how much, DDMM improves mobility performance. For comparison, Mobile IPv6, Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6), and PMIPv6 localized routing (PMIPv6-LR) were considered as representative IP mobility protocols following CMM approaches. Analytical results demonstrate that DDMM generally achieves higher performance when compared with CMM-based protocols in terms of packet delivery cost, tunneling overhead, and throughput, but specific performance varies in function of multiple input parameters.

[1]  Rui L. Aguiar,et al.  On the impacts of distributed and Dynamic Mobility Management strategy: A simulation study , 2013, 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD).

[2]  Rui L. Aguiar,et al.  Load-Balancing Proxy Mobile IPv6 Networks with Mobility Session Redirection , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  Alex Reznik,et al.  Towards flat and distributed mobility management: A 3GPP evolved network design , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[4]  H Anthony Chan Proxy mobile IP with distributed mobility anchors , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[5]  Rajeev Koodli,et al.  Localized Routing for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2012, RFC.

[6]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  A Study on Performance of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in IP-Based Cellular Networks , 2004 .

[7]  Wolfgang Hahn 3GPP Evolved Packet Core support for distributed mobility anchors: Control enhancements for GW relocation , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[8]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Channel Occupancy Times and Handoff Rate for Mobile Computing and PCS Networks , 1998, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[9]  Meryem Ouzzif,et al.  Distributed Mobility Management: Approaches and analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[10]  Meryem Ouzzif,et al.  Comparative performance analysis on dynamic mobility anchoring and proxy mobile IPv6 , 2012, The 15th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications.

[11]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Distributed mobility management for efficient video delivery over all-IP mobile networks: Competing approaches , 2013, IEEE Network.

[12]  Hui Deng,et al.  Mobility Header Home Agent Switch Message , 2008, RFC.

[13]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Distributed or Centralized Mobility? , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[14]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  Distributed mobility management: A standards landscape , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Susana Sargento,et al.  Studying the integration of distributed and dynamic schemes in the mobility management , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[16]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management , 2012, RFC.

[17]  M. Thomas Queueing Systems. Volume 1: Theory (Leonard Kleinrock) , 1976 .

[18]  Li Yi,et al.  An analytical study of distributed mobility management schemes with a flow duration based model , 2014, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[19]  Jianping Pan,et al.  Adaptive Route Optimization in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[20]  Wolfgang Hahn Flat 3GPP Evolved Packet Core , 2011, 2011 The 14th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).

[21]  James Kempf,et al.  Problem Statement for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM) , 2007, RFC.

[22]  Rui L. Aguiar,et al.  Empowering IP multicast for multimedia delivery over heterogeneous mobile wireless networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[23]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Theory, Volume 1, Queueing Systems , 1975 .

[24]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  An Evaluation of Dynamic Mobility Anchoring , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[25]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Distributed Mobility Management: Current Practices and Gap Analysis , 2015, RFC.

[26]  Wen-Tsuen Chen,et al.  Architecture for mobility and QoS support in all-IP wireless networks , 2004, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[27]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  IP flow mobility: smart traffic offload for future wireless networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  A PMIPv6-based solution for Distributed Mobility Management , 2017 .

[29]  Peter J. McCann,et al.  Design of a flat wireless Internet Service Provider network , 2011, 2011 The 14th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).

[30]  Rui L. Aguiar,et al.  Use-cases analysis for multicast listener support in network-based distributed mobility management , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[31]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Host-based distributed mobility management support protocol for IPv6 mobile networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[32]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Teletraffic analysis and mobility modeling of PCS networks , 1999, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[33]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Distributed IP mobility management from the perspective of the IETF: motivations, requirements, approaches, comparison, and challenges , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.