Different strokes for different folks: scaling a blended model of teacher professional learning

The purpose of this paper is to describe an innovative model of teacher professional learning that has evolved over a decade (2006 to 2016).,Working in a range of different school contexts, in conjunction with an ongoing engagement with the research literature, has enabled the development over three phases of a robust yet flexible framework that meets teachers’ expressed needs. At the same time, the framework helps to shift teachers’ pedagogical orientations, as the learning design supports school-focused, job-embedded teacher professional learning, which challenges more traditional instructional environments by infusing digital technologies and other elements of twenty-first century skills into teaching and learning.,Building on the experiences of the first two phases, the paper reports the most recent phase which expands on the emergence of a fourth wave of online learning to design and develop a massive open online course (MOOC) that potentially enables the massive scaling up of access to this already validated model of teacher professional development. The importance of maintaining key elements, threshold concepts and signature pedagogies in the design of MOOCs for teacher professional learning are discussed, and the paper concludes with early lessons from this latest work in progress.,Challenges are identified relating to the design of the social supports within the MOOC structure to sustain the collaboration, dialogue and ongoing reflection observed across Phases 1 and 2 that are necessary for the changes in pedagogical orientation and classroom practices.

[1]  Maureen Ebben,et al.  Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship , 2014 .

[2]  L. Darling-Hammond The Quiet Revolution: Rethinking Teacher Development. , 1996 .

[3]  Grupo Banco Mundial,et al.  Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action: towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all , 2016 .

[4]  J. Herman,et al.  Defining Twenty-First Century Skills , 2012 .

[5]  Anthony G. Picciano Online Education Policy and Practice: The Past, Present, and Future of the Digital University , 2016 .

[6]  Linda Darling-Hammond Reframing the School Reform Agenda: Developing Capacity for School Transformation. , 1993 .

[7]  Rebecca Vivian,et al.  Addressing the challenges of a new digital technologies curriculum: MOOCs as a scalable solution for teacher professional development , 2014 .

[8]  Priscilla Norton,et al.  Regional Educational Technology Assistance Initiative—Phase II , 1998 .

[9]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Examining Teacher Technology Use , 2003 .

[10]  Colin Smith,et al.  Professional Development by Distance Education: does distance lend enhancement? , 1998 .

[11]  Deirdre Butler,et al.  Moving Towards Innovation: The development of a sustainable framework for teacher professional development , 2010 .

[12]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[13]  Krista Glazewski,et al.  Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project , 2003 .

[14]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Deirdre Butler,et al.  Sharing Classroom Practices: A Scalable, Sustainable Model of Teacher Professional Development for Learning in the 21st Century , 2011 .

[16]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41. , 2009 .

[17]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort , 2007 .

[18]  Nancy Law,et al.  Pedagogical Orientations in Mathematics and Science and the Use of ICT , 2008 .

[19]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Changing Conceptions of Teaching and Teacher Development. , 1995 .

[20]  Beatrice Ávalos Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years , 2011 .

[21]  Simon Veenman,et al.  The Coaching of Teachers: Results of Five Training Studies , 2001 .

[22]  D. Perkins Smart Schools: From Training Memories to Educating Minds , 1992 .

[23]  J. Greene,et al.  Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course , 2015 .

[24]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students , 2016 .

[25]  Fiona M. Hollands and Devayani Tirthali MOOCs: Expectations and Reality , 2014 .

[26]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[27]  Leon Chaitow A rich seam. , 2011, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.

[28]  M. Fullan,et al.  Understanding Teacher Development. , 1992 .

[29]  Patrick R. Lowenthal,et al.  Teacher Professional Development in the Digital Age:Design Considerations for MOOCs for Teachers , 2016 .

[30]  Geoff Sharrock,et al.  Making sense of the MOOCs debate , 2015 .

[31]  Virginia Richardson-Koehler,et al.  Teacher change and the staff development process : a case in reading instruction , 1994 .

[32]  B. Joyce,et al.  The Evolution of Peer Coaching , 1996 .

[33]  Joseph Jay Williams,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014 , 2015 .

[34]  S. Loucks-Horsley Principles of Effective Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Education: A Synthesis of Standards , 1996 .

[35]  J. Little Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform , 1993 .