Investigating the Effectiveness of Inquiry Instruction on the Motivation of Different Learning Styles Students

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate 8th graders with different learning styles their motivation outcomes after implementing 10 weeks (40 hours) inquiry-based teaching. Two hundreds and fifty four 8th graders were involved in experimental group, this group of students experienced inquiry instruction. Two hundreds and thirty two 8th graders were involved in control group, they were taught by traditional science teaching. Students' motivation toward science learning questionnaire (SMTSL) (Tuan, Chin & Shieh, 2005) were implemented in both groups in the beginning and at the end of the study. Students in the experimental group filled out learning preference questionnaire (Lumsdaine & Lumsdaine, 1995) in the beginning of the study. Forty students which represent different learning styles were chosen from five experimental classes to conduct post-test interview. Paired t-test, MANOVA, analytic inductive methods were used for analyzing both qualitative and quantitative data. Findings indicated that after inquiry instruction students' motivation increased significantly (p<.001) than students who enrolled in traditional teaching. Four different learning styles of students increased significantly (p<.005) in SMTSL scales: self-efficacy, active learning strategies, science learning value, performance goal and achievement goal. No significant difference was found among four learning styles of students' motivation after inquiry teaching. Interview data supported that most of students with different learning styles were willing to participate in the inquiry learning activities, while they hold different reasons for their engagement. Findings confirm inquiry-based science teaching can motivate students with different learning styles in science learning.

[1]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[2]  Helen L. Gibson,et al.  Longitudinal impact of an inquiry‐based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science , 2002 .

[3]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors , 1999 .

[4]  R Dunn,et al.  Grouping students for instruction: effects of learning style on achievement and attitudes. , 1990, The Journal of social psychology.

[5]  Claudia T. Melear.  Cognitive Process Analysis of Test Questions in a Computer-Managed College Biology Course Based on a Learning Style Assessment with Emphasis on Analytic-Spatial Skill. , 1990 .

[6]  B. Weiner.  History of motivational research in education , 1990 .

[7]  Julie Bianchini,et al.  Teaching the Nature of Science through Inquiry to Prospective Elementary Teachers: A Tale of Two Researchers , 2000 .

[8]  Randy Yerrick,et al.  Lower track science students' argumentation and open inquiry instruction , 2000 .

[9]  M. Lepper,et al.  Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. , 1993 .

[10]  Justin Dillon,et al.  The effect of practical work on students' understanding of combustion , 1995 .

[11]  W. Doyle,et al.  Classroom research on matching learning and teaching styles , 1984 .

[12]  Claudia B. Douglass.  Making Biology Easier to Understand. , 1979 .

[13]  Jack Hassard.  Minds on science : middle and secondary school methods / Jack Hassard , 1992 .

[14]  R. Dunn.  Learning--A Matter of Style. , 1979 .

[15]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  A sixty-year perspective on three issues in science education: I. Whose ideas. Are Dominant? II. Representation of women. III. Reflective thinking and problem solving , 1977 .

[16]  Monika Lumsdaine,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for a Changing World , 1994 .

[17]  F. Cano-García,et al.  Learning and Thinking Styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement , 2000 .

[18]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effect of instruction supplied with the investigative‐oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course , 1996 .

[19]  Stanley L. Helgeson,et al.  Science education research interests of elementary teachers , 1987 .

[20]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[21]  M. Towns,et al.  An Action Research Project on Student Perspectives of Cooperative Learning in Chemistry: Understanding the Efficacy of Small-Group Activities. , 1998 .

[22]  William J. Boone,et al.  Self‐efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers , 1998 .

[23]  Billie Eilam,et al.  Strata of comprehending ecology: Looking through the prism of feeding relations , 2002 .

[24]  R. Snyder.  The Relationship between Learning Styles/ Multiple Intelligences and Academic Achievement of High School Students , 1999 .

[25]  R. Dunn.  Learning style: State of the science , 1984 .

[26]  Helen Parke,et al.  Social interaction and the use of analogy: An analysis of preservice teachers' talk during physics inquiry lessons , 2003 .

[27]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2003 .

[28]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[29]  The Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing Students' Motivation toward Science Learning. , 2002 .

[30]  L. Curry.  An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. , 1983 .

[31]  Ö. Geban,et al.  The Effect of Learning Styles on High School Students' Achievement and Attitudes in Chemistry. , 2003 .

[32]  Uri Toller.  Teaching/learning styles, performance, and students' teaching evaluation in S/T/E/S‐focused science teacher education: A quasiquantitative probe of a case study , 1991 .

[33]  Trish Stoddart,et al.  Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners , 2002 .

[34]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science , 2001 .

[35]  The Communication of Laboratory Investigations by University Entrants , 2000 .

[36]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[37]  Nigel Marlow,et al.  The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Robert J. Garmston.  How Administrators Support Peer Coaching. , 1987 .

[39]  M. Bong,et al.  Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction , 2000 .

[40]  Thomas A. Charles,et al.  An Analysis of College Students' Motivation and Learning Strategies in Computer Courses: A Cognitive View. , 2001 .

[41]  Mark W. Hackling,et al.  High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry , 1998 .

[42]  C. Claxton,et al.  Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1987. , 1987 .

[43]  Ned Herrmann.  The Creative Brain , 1981 .

[44]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  A Comparison of Concrete and Formal Science Instruction upon Science Achievement and Reasoning Ability of Sixth Grade Students. , 1987 .

[45]  S. Ball.  Motivation in Education , 1977 .

[46]  Chi‐Chin Chin,et al.  The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning , 2005 .

[47]  John Leach,et al.  UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE STUDENTS' IMAGES OF SCIENCE , 1999 .

[48]  The Effect of Matching and Mismatching Cognitive Style and Science Instruction. , 1987 .

[49]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[50]  James D. Ellis,et al.  Using Video To Evoke Reflection on Science Teaching. Interim Report of NSF-Supported Project: Teacher Development Modules for Elementary School Science. , 1995 .

[51]  M. Hanrahan.  The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning , 1998 .

[52]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations , 1981 .

[53]  Sue Dale Tunnicliffe,et al.  Looking for ideas: observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking science investigations , 2001 .