The recyclability benefit rate of closed-loop and open-loop systems: a case study on plastic recycling in Flanders

a b s t r a c t Over the last few years, waste management strategies are shifting from waste disposal to recycling and recovery and are considering waste as a potential new resource. To monitor the progress in these waste management strategies, governmental policies have developed a wide range of indicators. In this study, we analyzed the concept of the recyclability benefit rate indicator, which expresses the potential envi- ronmental savings that can be achieved from recycling the product over the environmental burdens of virgin production followed by disposal. This indicator is therefore, based on estimated environmental impact values obtained through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) practices. We quantify the environmental impact in terms of resource consumption using the Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Envi- ronment method. This research applied this indicator to two cases of plastic waste recycling in Flanders: closed-loop recycling (case A) and open-loop recycling (case B). Each case is compared to an inciner- ation scenario and a landfilling scenario. The considered plastic waste originates from small domestic appliances and household waste other than plastic bottles. However, the existing recyclability benefit rate indicator does not consider the potential substitution of different materials occurring in open-loop recycling. To address this issue, we further developed the indicator for open-loop recycling and cascaded use. Overall, the results show that both closed-loop and open-loop recycling are more resource efficient than landfilling and incineration with energy recovery.

[1]  G. Dóka Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services , 2003 .

[2]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Thermodynamic resource indicators in LCA: a case study on the titania produced in Panzhihua city, southwest China , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Onwughara Innocent Nkwachukwu,et al.  Focus on potential environmental issues on plastic world towards a sustainable plastic recycling in developing countries , 2013, International Journal of Industrial Chemistry.

[5]  Maarten Dubois Towards a coherent European approach for taxation of combustible waste. , 2013, Waste management.

[6]  Jun Nakatani,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Recycling: Mathematical and Graphical Frameworks , 2014 .

[7]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Utilization of recovered wood in cascades versus utilization of primary wood—a comparison with life cycle assessment using system expansion , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives. , 2014, Waste management.

[9]  Mariaenrica Frigione,et al.  Concrete with polymers , 2013 .

[10]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  B. Boryczko,et al.  Depletion of the non-renewable natural resource reserves in copper, zinc, lead and aluminium production , 2014 .

[12]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Identification and assessment of product's measures to improve resource efficiency: the case-study of an Energy using Product , 2014 .

[13]  Oliver Heidrich,et al.  A case study of the open-loop recycling of mixed plastic waste for use in a sports-field drainage system. , 2010 .

[14]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Appliance remanufacturing and life cycle energy and economic savings , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[15]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators , 2015 .

[17]  David Lazarevic,et al.  Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: Comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[18]  Pilar Swart,et al.  Abiotic Resource Use , 2015 .

[19]  Jannick H. Schmidt,et al.  Inventory of country specific electricity in LCA: consequential and attributional scenarios. Methodology report v2. , 2011 .

[20]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. , 2014, Waste management.