Extending Construal Level Theory to Distributed Teams: Perception and Evaluation of Distant Others

Building on prior research on distributed teams that has identified physical and temporal distance as impediments to collaboration and relationship development, this paper explores how and why we treat geographically distant others differently from those who are proximal. According to construal level theory, physically- or temporally-distant events or objects are more psychologically distant and are more likely to be described in terms of their more general characteristics, while views of more proximal events or objects will be more detailed and nuanced. We extend construal level theory to the distributed team context by advancing propositions about how group members perceive and evaluate distant others in contrast to proximal others. By comparing to alternative computer-mediated communication and social psychological theories that have been applied to this phenomenon, we show that construal level theory offers parsimonious explanations as well as novel predictions about how and why we perceive and evaluate distant others differently. The paper then considers theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of construal level theory for distributed teams and other virtual settings.

[1]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Measures and models of perceived group variability. , 1990 .

[2]  R G McGee,et al.  A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[4]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[5]  S. Seashore Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[6]  Raymond Lister,et al.  Not seeing the forest for the trees: novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[7]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[8]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Perceived Variability of Personal Characteristics in In-Groups and Out-Groups , 1981 .

[10]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[11]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[13]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? , 2001, Commun. Res..

[16]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[17]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[18]  Kimberly S. Jaussi,et al.  Functional Background Identity, Diversity, and Individual Performance in Cross-Functional Teams , 2003 .

[19]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[20]  Douglas Dow,et al.  A Note on Psychological Distance and Export Market Selection , 2000 .

[21]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[22]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[23]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[25]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[26]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology , 2007 .

[27]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[28]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[29]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves , 2007 .

[30]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[32]  C. Saunders,et al.  “Is It Already 4 a.m. in Your Time Zone?” , 2007 .

[33]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[34]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications , 2008 .

[35]  I. Zigurs Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[36]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception , 2002, CSCW '02.

[37]  Suzy Siddons,et al.  Remote Working: Linking people and organizations , 2003 .

[38]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Videoconferencing in the Field: A Heuristic Processing Model , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. , 1988 .

[40]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[41]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Transcending the "here": the effect of spatial distance on social judgment. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Shu Z. Schiller,et al.  Virtual Team Research , 2007 .

[43]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. , 1995 .

[45]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Time Effects in Computer-Mediated Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2002 .

[47]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[48]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[49]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Conditions Enabling Effective Multiple Team Membership , 2007, Virtuality and Virtualization.

[50]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[51]  Jean Wilson,et al.  Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close , 2008 .

[52]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[53]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Frieder R Lang,et al.  Blood Is Thicker Than Water : Kinship Orientation Across Adulthood , 2003 .

[55]  M. A. Beauchamp AN IMPROVED INDEX OF CENTRALITY. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[56]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[57]  Philip Broemer Ease of Recall Moderates the Impact of Relationship-Related Goals on Judgments of Interpersonal Closeness , 2001 .

[58]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited , 2001, Commun. Res..

[59]  Y. Trope,et al.  The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. , 2002 .

[60]  Y. Trope,et al.  Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others' Actions. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[61]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[62]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Go (Con)Figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[63]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[65]  J. Bolland,et al.  Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks , 1988 .

[66]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[67]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Creeping dispositionism: the temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Research Note - Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. , 1999 .

[70]  Brayden G. King,et al.  The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions , 2009 .

[71]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[72]  M. Baba,et al.  The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team , 2004 .

[73]  Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  S. Weisband Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work , 2007 .

[75]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[77]  C. Sedikides,et al.  Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. , 1992 .

[78]  J. Walther Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[79]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  THE DIALECTICAL DYNAMICS OF NESTED STRUCTURATION IN GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS. , 2009 .

[80]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Y. Trope,et al.  Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[82]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[83]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance? , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[84]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Saving the worst for last: The effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens☆ , 2003 .

[85]  M. Mortensen,et al.  Being There: Firsthand Experience and Perceived Reflected Knowledge in Engendering Trust in Global Collaboration , 2009 .

[86]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[87]  Douglas Dow,et al.  Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli , 2006 .

[88]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[90]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[91]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[92]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Comparing Virtual Teams to Traditional Teams: An Identification of New Research Opportunities , 2006 .

[93]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Extending the Faultline Model to Geographically Dispersed Teams: How Colocated Subgroups can Impair Group Functioning , 2006 .

[94]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[95]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[96]  D. Derryberry,et al.  Anxiety and attentional focusing: trait, state and hemispheric influences , 1998 .

[97]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[98]  C. Handy Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[99]  A V Carron,et al.  The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. , 1989, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[100]  Leon Festinger,et al.  ARCHITECTURE AND GROUP MEMBERSHIP , 2010 .

[101]  W. Mischel,et al.  The personality of familiar and significant people: the lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[102]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[103]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[104]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[105]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[106]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Polarized appraisals of out-group members. , 1980 .

[107]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events , 2006, Psychological science.

[108]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[109]  M. Brewer,et al.  Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[110]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[111]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[112]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[113]  D. Campbell Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[114]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING? , 2004 .

[115]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[116]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[117]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations , 2007 .

[118]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[119]  Y. Trope,et al.  Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[120]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[121]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory , 1999 .

[122]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[123]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .