A novel crack size quantification method based on lamb wave simulation

In recent years, Lamb wave has shown great potential in structural integrity assessment and life prediction due to the capability of traveling at large distances in structures with little energy loss. However, most of existing researches of Lamb wave based damage detection mainly focus on specific target systems. Physical models which correlate the crack size and damage sensitive features may vary with different structural geometry, loading profile et al. Therefore, it is of significant interest to develop a general methodology for reliable, efficient and accurate crack quantification for different structures. This paper presents a crack size quantification method based on finite element simulation. Lamb wave propagation mechanism is studied by Abaqus simulation. A series of simulations of both healthy plate and plates with different crack sizes are performed using Abaqus CAE. According to existing literatures, S0 mode of Lamb wave is sensitive with crack damage. Thus first wave package of S0 mode is chosen to extract damage features from measured time series. Two damage sensitive features: normalized amplitude and correlation coefficients are identified by analyzing simulation results and employed to establish a crack size quantification model. Considering the uncertainties caused by different manufacturing and environmental conditions, series of coupon tests are performed and the same damage sensitive features of testing data are extracted. The effectiveness of the proposed crack size quantification method is verified by data of coupon test.

[1]  O. Arda Vanli,et al.  Statistical updating of finite element model with Lamb wave sensing data for damage detection problems , 2014 .

[2]  Jeong-Beom Ihn,et al.  Pitch-catch Active Sensing Methods in Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Structures , 2008 .

[3]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Simulation of Interaction Between Lamb Waves and Cracks for Structural Health Monitoring With Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors , 2012 .

[4]  Ajit K. Mal,et al.  Rayleigh to Lamb wave conversion at a delamination-like crack , 2015 .

[5]  Z. Chang,et al.  Scattering of Lamb waves from a rivet hole with edge cracks , 1999 .

[6]  Jingjing He,et al.  Probabilistic inference of fatigue damage propagation with limited and partial information , 2015 .

[7]  Srinivasan Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Rapid localization of damage using a circular sensor array and Lamb wave based triangulation , 2010 .

[8]  SeJin Han,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Lamb Waves Acting within a Thin Aluminum Plate , 2012 .

[9]  Eurípedes G.O. Nóbrega,et al.  A Lamb Wave Based Method for the Assessment of Faults in Aluminium Plates , 2012 .

[10]  Victor Giurgiutiu 12 – SIGNAL PROCESSING AND PATTERN RECOGNITION FOR PWAS-BASED STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING , 2008 .

[11]  J.E. Michaels,et al.  Detection of structural damage from the local temporal coherence of diffuse ultrasonic signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Jeong-Beom Ihn,et al.  Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Validation using riveted joints and repair patches , 2004 .

[13]  Christian Boller,et al.  Fatigue in aerostructures—where structural health monitoring can contribute to a complex subject , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Chen Huipeng,et al.  A probabilistic crack size quantification method using in-situ Lamb wave test and Bayesian updating , 2016 .