Frequency Effects with Visual Words and Syllables in a Dyslexic Reader

The present study investigated the nature of the inhibitory syllable frequency effect, recently reported for normal readers, in a German-speaking dyslexic patient. The reading impairment was characterized as a severe deficit in naming single letters or words in the presence of spared lexical processing of visual word forms. Three visual lexical decision experiments were conducted with the dyslexic patient, an unimpaired control person matched to the patient and a control group: Experiment 1 manipulated the frequency of words and word-initial syllables and demonstrated systematic effects of both factors in normal readers and in the dyslexic patient. The syllable frequency effect was replicated in a second experiment with a more strictly controlled stimulus set. Experiment 3 confirmed the patient’s deficit in activating phonological forms from written words by demonstrating that a pseudohomophone effect as observed in the unimpaired control participants was absent in the dyslexic patient.

[1]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[2]  A. W. Ellis Normality and pathology in cognitive functions , 1982 .

[3]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Nonword Visual Processing in a Language with Shallow Orthography , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[7]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency , 2004, Brain and Language.

[8]  Annette Kinder,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. , 1994 .

[10]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[12]  A. J. Marcel,et al.  Aphasia, Dyslexia and the Phonological Coding of Written Words , 1977 .

[13]  Wolfram Ziegler,et al.  Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech , 2004, Brain and Language.

[14]  Marina Laganaro,et al.  Syllable frequency effect in speech production: evidence from aphasia , 2005, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[16]  Conrad Perry,et al.  The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German , 2000 .

[17]  G. V. van Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Herbert Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .

[19]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition , 2004 .

[20]  A. Marcel,et al.  Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition. , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  Boris New,et al.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[23]  D. Bub,et al.  Pure Alexia: Attempted Rehabilitation and Its Implications for Interpretation of the Deficit , 1994, Brain and Language.

[24]  J C Ziegler,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[26]  D. Besner,et al.  Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[28]  D. Plaut,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The European Society for Cognitive Psychology , 1999 .

[30]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Autonomy of Lexical Orthography , 1997 .

[31]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? , 2004 .

[32]  M. Lesch,et al.  The representation of sublexical orthographic-phonologic correspondences: evidence from phonological dyslexia. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Visual processing of lexical and sublexical units in dyslexia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[35]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllable Frequency and Visual Word Recognition in Spanish , 1993 .

[36]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  The Pseudohomophone Effect: The Role of Visual Similarity in Non-Word Decisions , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[37]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[39]  Jean-Luc Nespoulous,et al.  Syllables as units in speech production: Data from aphasia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[40]  H. Coslett,et al.  Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  董瑞国,et al.  Aphasia , 2003, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[42]  H. Barber,et al.  Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.

[43]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[44]  G. Mcreddie Aphasia , 1868, The Indian medical gazette.

[45]  J. Hanley,et al.  Preserved access to abstract letter identities despite abolished letter naming in a case of pure alexia , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.