Machine learning-assisted multiphysics coupling performance optimization in a photocatalytic hydrogen production system

Abstract The application of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution is plagued by low energy conversion efficiency. To achieve the maximum hydrogen production, a new optimization model with partial differential equations (PDE) as constrained conditions is constructed, and the Sobol’ method is employed to quantify the operation condition prioritization and determine the decision variables. To alleviate the computation efforts of daunting optimization problem, the Gaussian process regression (GPR) method is developed to approximate the original optimization problem. A three-dimension multiphysical coupling mathematical model for a photocatalytic reactor is built and validated by the experimental data, which is further employed to investigate the dynamic evolution behaviors of hydrogen yield under different working conditions and compute training samples. A new memetic algorithm integrating the performance advantages of whale optimization (WO) method and simulated annealing (SA) algorithm is developed to search for a high-quality solution. The encouraging results on typical reaction processes clearly imply that the proposed method achieves the coordination of reaction mechanism and operation parameters, reduces the computing complex and load, and successfully finds the optimal operation conditions that will maximize the conversion efficiency of solar energy to hydrogen energy. The research outcomes open new avenues to improve the hydrogen production and accelerate industrial applications of the technology.

[1]  Moses O. Tadé,et al.  Light intensity distribution in heterogenous photocatalytic reactors , 2008 .

[2]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[3]  R. Hegner,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis of an HCCI engine polygeneration process , 2020 .

[4]  X. Verykios,et al.  Hydrogen Production by Photo-Induced Reforming of Biomass Components and Derivatives at Ambient Conditions , 2008 .

[5]  A. Weber,et al.  Evaluating particle-suspension reactor designs for Z-scheme solar water splitting via transport and kinetic modeling , 2018 .

[6]  Dimitris G. Giovanis,et al.  Spectral representation-based neural network assisted stochastic structural mechanics , 2015 .

[7]  P. J. Valades-Pelayo,et al.  Validity of the Six-Flux model for photoreactors , 2017 .

[8]  Wei Tian,et al.  A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis , 2013 .

[9]  K. Davis,et al.  Sensitivity, uncertainty and time dependence of parameters in a complex land surface model , 2008 .

[10]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[11]  Jing Lei,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Inversion Method for Imaging Problems in Electrical Capacitance Tomography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Optimization of the radiation absorption for a scaled-up photocatalytic hydrogen production system , 2018 .

[14]  Xiaoze Du,et al.  Performance analysis of photocatalytic CO2 reduction in optical fiber monolith reactor with multiple inverse lights , 2014 .

[15]  Baoqing Deng,et al.  Numerical simulation of radiation distribution in a slurry reactor: The effect of distribution of catalyst particles , 2019, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[16]  Renato Pajarola,et al.  Sobol Tensor Trains for Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Jing Lei,et al.  Three-dimensional temperature distribution reconstruction using the extreme learning machine , 2017, IET Signal Process..

[18]  M. Vivar,et al.  Performance study of a hybrid photovoltaic and solar water disinfection system considering climatic variations over a year , 2017 .

[19]  Luca Ambrogioni,et al.  Complex-valued gaussian process regression for time series analysis , 2016, Signal Process..

[20]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor Engineering , 2001 .

[21]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Experimental study of direct solar photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production under natural circulation conditions , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[22]  Hoseong Lee,et al.  Optimization of dynamic poly-generation system and evaluation of system performance in building application , 2019 .

[23]  I. Dincer,et al.  Design and analysis of a new system for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production from wastewater , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[24]  I. Ortiz,et al.  Kinetic performance of TiO2/Pt/reduced graphene oxide composites in the photocatalytic hydrogen production , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[25]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[26]  L. M. Gandía,et al.  Kinetic analysis and CFD simulations of the photocatalytic production of hydrogen in silicone microreactors from water-ethanol mixtures , 2017 .

[27]  Peter Benner,et al.  Using surrogate models for efficient optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[28]  N. Amin,et al.  Photocatalytic CO2 methanation over NiO/In2O3 promoted TiO2 nanocatalysts using H2O and/or H2 reductants , 2016 .

[29]  Aliasghar Arab,et al.  An adaptive gradient descent-based local search in memetic algorithm applied to optimal controller design , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Fabio Fiorelli,et al.  Deep learning‐based surrogate modeling and optimization for microalgal biofuel production and photobioreactor design , 2018, AIChE Journal.

[31]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Efficient input-output model representations , 1999 .

[32]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[33]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Investigation and modeling of CPC based tubular photocatalytic reactor for scaled-up hydrogen production , 2016 .

[34]  M. Feilizadeh,et al.  An intrinsic kinetic model for liquid‐phase photocatalytic hydrogen production , 2019, AIChE Journal.

[35]  A. Fujishima,et al.  Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode , 1972, Nature.

[36]  Joong Hoon Kim,et al.  A practical multi-objective design approach for optimum exhaust heat recovery from hybrid stand-alone PV-diesel power systems , 2017 .

[37]  A. Emeline,et al.  Why do Hydrogen and Oxygen Yields from Semiconductor-Based Photocatalyzed Water Splitting Remain Disappointingly Low? Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Impacting Surface Redox Reactions , 2016 .

[38]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Obstacles of solar-powered photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production: A perspective from energy flow and mass flow , 2019, Energy.

[39]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of health , 2017, 1703.05687.

[40]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  Structure optimization based on memetic algorithm for adjusting epidemic threshold on complex networks , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[41]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  A fully multiple-criteria implementation of the Sobol' method for parameter sensitivity analysis , 2012 .

[42]  Flavio Cannavó,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[43]  P. Fornasiero,et al.  Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Rift into the Future Energy Supply , 2017 .

[44]  Hironori Arakawa,et al.  Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst , 2001, Nature.

[45]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Update 1 of: Sensitivity analysis for chemical models. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[46]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Solar concentrator with uniform irradiance for particulate photocatalytic hydrogen production system , 2016 .

[47]  Clifton A. Shook,et al.  Modelling Heterogeneous Slurry Flows at High Velocities , 2008 .

[48]  Jianyuan Zhai,et al.  Nonlinear variable selection algorithms for surrogate modeling , 2019, AIChE Journal.

[49]  M. Millinger,et al.  Robust bioenergy technologies for the German heat transition: A novel approach combining optimization modeling with Sobol’ sensitivity analysis , 2020 .

[50]  Marc Toussaint,et al.  Efficient sparsification for Gaussian process regression , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[51]  N. S. Amin,et al.  Tailoring performance of La-modified TiO2 nanocatalyst for continuous photocatalytic CO2 reforming of CH4 to fuels in the presence of H2O , 2018 .

[52]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  The Whale Optimization Algorithm , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..