Mathematical Models and Reality: A Constructivist Perspective

To explore the relation between mathematical models and reality, four different domains of reality are distinguished: observer-independent reality (to which there is no direct access), personal reality, social reality and mathematical/formal reality. The concepts of personal and social reality are strongly inspired by constructivist ideas. Mathematical reality is social as well, but constructed as an autonomous system in order to make absolute agreement possible. The essential problem of mathematical modelling is that within mathematics there is agreement about ‘truth’, but the assignment of mathematics to informal reality is not itself formally analysable, and it is dependent on social and personal construction processes. On these levels, absolute agreement cannot be expected. Starting from this point of view, repercussion of mathematical on social and personal reality, the historical development of mathematical modelling, and the role, use and interpretation of mathematical models in scientific practice are discussed.

[1]  Philip Kitcher,et al.  The nature of mathematical knowledge , 1985 .

[2]  Philip J. Davis,et al.  The Mathematical Experience , 1982 .

[3]  L. Apostel Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences , 1960, Synthese.

[4]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[5]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where Mathematics Comes From , 2000 .

[6]  E. Cassirer,et al.  Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit Von Hegels Tod bis zur Gegenwart(1832-1932) , 1910 .

[7]  Thomas L. Heath,et al.  A History of Greek Mathematics , 1923, The Classical Review.

[8]  H. Freudenthal,et al.  The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences , 1961 .

[9]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .

[10]  Galileo Galilei,et al.  Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze (1638) , 1958 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations , 1991 .

[12]  A. S. Troelstra,et al.  Set Theory, Arithmetic, and Foundations of Mathematics: History of constructivism in the 20th century , 2011 .

[13]  K. Gergen An invitation to social construction , 1999 .

[14]  Leo Apostel,et al.  Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences , 1960, Synthese.

[15]  A. Hertz,et al.  Die prinzipien der mechanik in neuem zusammenhang dargestellt , 1895 .

[16]  W. Heisenberg Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science , 1958 .

[17]  E. Glasersfeld,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Experiential Foundations of Mathematical Concepts Revisited , 2006 .

[18]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[19]  E. Glasersfeld Who Conceives of Society , 2008 .

[20]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[21]  I. Hacking The Social Construction of What , 1999 .

[22]  E. Glasersfeld Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. , 1995 .

[23]  Chester Hartman,et al.  Rejoinder by the Author , 1965 .

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001, Statistical Science.

[25]  Paul Ernest Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics , 1997 .

[26]  Stephen M. Stigler,et al.  The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 , 1986 .

[27]  Heinz von Foerster,et al.  On Constructing a Reality , 2015, Environmental Design Research.

[28]  David Burton,et al.  The History of Mathematics , 2014 .

[29]  R. D. Queiroz,et al.  Model Theory , 1999 .

[30]  Donald A. Martin,et al.  Mathematical Problems. Lecture Delivered Before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900 , 1979 .

[31]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[32]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .