Population responses to perturbations: Predictions and responses from laboratory mite populations

1. Mathematical models are frequently used to make predictions of the response of a population to management interventions or environmental perturbations, but it is rarely possible to make controlled or replicated tests of the accuracy of these predictions. 2. We report results from replicated laboratory experiments on populations of a soil mite, Sancassania berlesei, living in 'constant' or 'variable' environments. We experimentally perturbed vital rates, via selective harvesting, and examined the population-level responses. The response depends on the stage manipulated and whether there is environmental variability. Increased mortality usually decreased population size and increased population variability. However, egg mortality in a variable environment increased total population size. 3. We used time-series analysis to construct a stage-based population model of this system, incorporating the responses to both density and variation in food supply. 4. The time-series model qualitatively captures the population dynamics, but does not predict well the way the populations will respond to the change in mortality. Elasticity analysis, conducted on the model's output, therefore did not lead to accurate predictions. 5. The presence of indirect positive population effects of a negative perturbation, but only in a variable environment, suggests that predicting the population response will require the incorporation of density dependence and environmental stochasticity. That the considerable biological complexity of our time-series model did not allow accurate predictions suggests that accurate prediction requires modelling processes within a stage class rather than trying to make do with simple functions of total density.

[1]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions in winter survival in red deer , 1998 .

[2]  H. Caswell PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE PERTURBATION ANALYSES: THEIR ROLES IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2000 .

[3]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  A. Hastings,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics and Deterministic Skeletons: Population Behavior of Dungeness Crab , 1997 .

[5]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  C. Pfister,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VARIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MATRIX MODEL PREDICTIONS , 2003 .

[7]  T. Benton,et al.  Talkin’ 'bout My Generation: Environmental Variability and Cohort Effects , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[8]  A. R. Gallant,et al.  Noise and Nonlinearity in Measles Epidemics: Combining Mechanistic and Statistical Approaches to Population Modeling , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[9]  A. Grant,et al.  Density‐dependent populations require density‐dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the LPA model of Tribolium , 2003 .

[10]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Noisy Clockwork: Time Series Analysis of Population Fluctuations in Animals , 2001, Science.

[11]  T. Benton,et al.  The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system , 2002 .

[12]  T. Benton,et al.  Stage‐structured harvesting and its effects: an empirical investigation using soil mites , 2004 .

[13]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[14]  Brian Dennis,et al.  COMPLEX POPULATION DYNAMICS IN THE REAL WORLD: MODELING THE INFLUENCE OF TIME-VARYING PARAMETERS AND TIME LAGS , 1998 .

[15]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[16]  A. Grant,et al.  Evolutionary fitness in ecology: Comparing measures of fitness in stochastic, density-dependent environments , 2000 .

[17]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[18]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  The Many Growth Rates and Elasticities of Populations in Random Environments , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[19]  C. Fox,et al.  INHERITANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IN BODY SIZE: SUPERPARASITISM OF SEEDS AFFECTS PROGENY AND GRANDPROGENY BODY SIZE VIA A NONGENETIC MATERNAL EFFECT , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  N. Stenseth,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT COMPENSATION IN BLOWFLY POPULATIONS GIVE INDIRECTLY POSITIVE EFFECTS OF A TOXICANT , 2002 .

[21]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[22]  R. Freckleton,et al.  THE ROLE OF DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF A TROPICAL PALM , 1999 .

[23]  S. Stearns Life history evolution: successes, limitations, and prospects , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[24]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Ecology: Nonlinearity and the Moran effect , 2000, Nature.

[25]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  S. Long,et al.  Free-air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) in Global Change Research: A Review , 1999 .

[27]  Paul C. Cross,et al.  Using Logistic Regression to Analyze the Sensitivity of PVA Models: a Comparison of Methods Based on African Wild Dog Models , 2001 .

[28]  J. Vonesh,et al.  Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines , 2002, Oecologia.

[29]  REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN VARIABLE ENVIRONMENTS, OR ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IS FOR THE BIRDS , 2001 .

[30]  C. Osenberg,et al.  Multi-predator effects across life-history stages: non-additivity of egg- and larval-stage predation in an African treefrog , 2003 .

[31]  M. Crawley,et al.  reply: Nonlinearity and the Moran effect , 2000, Nature.

[32]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. , 2001, Science.

[33]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study , 2002 .

[34]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Cycles and trends in cod populations. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. Grant,et al.  OPTIMAL REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN STOCHASTIC, DENSITY‐DEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Life Stage Simulation Analysis: Estimating Vital-Rate Effects on Population Growth for Conservation , 2000 .

[37]  S. Ellner,et al.  Stochastic matrix models for conservation and management: A comparative review of methods , 2001 .

[38]  Hartvig Christie,et al.  EFFECTS OF DENSITY‐DEPENDENT AND STOCHASTIC PROCESSES ON THE REGULATION OF COD POPULATIONS , 2001 .

[39]  James E. Hines,et al.  Stochastic seasonality and nonlinear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent , 1997, Nature.

[40]  EVOLUTION IN THE REAL WORLD: STOCHASTIC VARIATION AND THE DETERMINANTS OF FITNESS IN CARLINA VULGARIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  A. Grant,et al.  ELASTICITY ANALYSIS FOR DENSITY‐DEPENDENT POPULATIONS IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS , 2000 .

[42]  T. Benton,et al.  Population Dynamics in a Noisy World: Lessons From a Mite Experimental System , 2005 .

[43]  A. Grant,et al.  Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Tim G. Benton,et al.  Population synchrony and environmental variation: an experimental demonstration , 2001 .