‘Severe’ wear challenge to ‘as-cast’ and ‘double heat-treated’ large-diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings

Abstract The wear generation of double-heat-treated and as-cast large-diameter metal-on-metal (MOM) hip bearings was investigated using standard- and ‘severe’-gait simulations. The test hypothesis was that double heat treatment would change MOM hip wear compared with the as-cast condition. Two groups of high-carbon MOM bearings of 40 mm diameter were manufactured and subjected to either hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and solution annealing (SA) or no heat treatment (as cast). The results showed no statistical difference between the two groups under both running-in and steady state conditions. Even under the most ‘severe’-gait simulation published to date, the mean volumetric wear rates were 2.9 and 3.9 mm3 per 106 cycles for the HIP-SA and as-cast bearings respectively, showing a ten-fold increase in wear compared with walking. These differences were not statistically different; therefore our hypothesis was negated. Changes in alloy microstructure do not appear to influence the wear behaviour of high-carbon cast MOM articulations with similar chemical compositions. This is in sharp contrast with the published significance of bearing diameter and radial clearance on the wear of MOM hip bearings.

[1]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part I: the role of materials. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  John Fisher,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearing wear with different swing phase loads. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[4]  D. Mcminn,et al.  Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. , 2003, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[5]  Julia C. Shelton,et al.  A hip simulator study of the influence of patient activity level on the wear of crosslinked polyethylene under smooth and roughened femoral conditions , 2001 .

[6]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of simulator kinematics on the wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  D Dowson,et al.  A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  J H Dumbleton,et al.  Effect of femoral head surface roughness on the wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  I C Clarke,et al.  Charnley wear model for validation of hip simulators' ball diameter versus polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene wear , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  M Semlitsch,et al.  Metal-On-Metal Articulation for Artificial Hip Joints: Laboratory Study and Clinical Results , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  R. Chiesa,et al.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J. Davidson,et al.  The effect of HIPing on the fatigue and tensile strength of a case, porous-coated Co-Cr-Mo alloy. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  I. Clarke,et al.  The wear pattern in metal-on-metal hip prostheses. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  R. Marti,et al.  Down-Hill Skiing after a Total Hip Replacement? , 2000 .

[18]  C. Rieker,et al.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants , 1999 .

[19]  H. McKellop,et al.  Degradation and Wear of Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene , 1985 .

[20]  R. Pilliar Powder metal-made orthopedic implants with porous surface for fixation by tissue ingrowth. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.