Seismic Hazard Analysis Using the Adaptive Kernel Density Estimation Technique for Chennai City

Conventional method of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) using the Cornell–McGuire approach requires identification of homogeneous source zones as the first step. This criterion brings along many issues and, hence, several alternative methods to hazard estimation have come up in the last few years. Methods such as zoneless or zone-free methods, modelling of earth’s crust using numerical methods with finite element analysis, have been proposed. Delineating a homogeneous source zone in regions of distributed seismicity and/or diffused seismicity is rather a difficult task. In this study, the zone-free method using the adaptive kernel technique to hazard estimation is explored for regions having distributed and diffused seismicity. Chennai city is in such a region with low to moderate seismicity so it has been used as a case study. The adaptive kernel technique is statistically superior to the fixed kernel technique primarily because the bandwidth of the kernel is varied spatially depending on the clustering or sparseness of the epicentres. Although the fixed kernel technique has proven to work well in general density estimation cases, it fails to perform in the case of multimodal and long tail distributions. In such situations, the adaptive kernel technique serves the purpose and is more relevant in earthquake engineering as the activity rate probability density surface is multimodal in nature. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) obtained from all the three approaches (i.e., the Cornell–McGuire approach, fixed kernel and adaptive kernel techniques) for 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years is around 0.087 g. The uniform hazard spectra (UHS) are also provided for different structural periods.

[1]  Abdel Razzaq Mugdadi,et al.  A bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation of functions of random variables , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[2]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[3]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  The Impact of the Spatial Uniform Distribution of Seismicity on Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation , 2006 .

[4]  S. K. Acharyya,et al.  Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs , 2000 .

[5]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  J. Baker,et al.  An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) , 2008 .

[7]  A. Frankel Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States , 1995 .

[8]  David W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[9]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Motion-based background subtraction using adaptive kernel density estimation , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[10]  T. G. Sitharam,et al.  Estimation of peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration for South India with local site effects: probabilistic approach , 2009 .

[11]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: an adaptive kernel algorithm , 1995 .

[12]  W. K. Mohanty,et al.  An overview on the seismic zonation and microzonation studies in India , 2009 .

[13]  R. Iyengar,et al.  Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in Peninsular India , 2007 .

[14]  D. Bertil,et al.  Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the Pyrenean region , 2008 .

[15]  R. Sinha,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation for Peninsular India , 2007 .

[16]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[17]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[18]  C. Beauval,et al.  The role of seismicity models in probabilistic seismic hazard estimation: comparison of a zoning and a smoothing approach , 2006 .

[19]  Ellis L. Krinitzsky,et al.  Earthquake probability in engineering—Part 2: Earthquake recurrence and limitations of Gutenberg-Richter b-values for the engineering of critical structures: The third Richard H. Jahns distinguished lecture in engineering geology , 1993 .

[20]  Ian Abramson On Bandwidth Variation in Kernel Estimates-A Square Root Law , 1982 .

[21]  Yue-Gau Chen,et al.  Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Based on Area Source Model and Seismicity Data , 1998 .

[22]  B. Rao Seismicity and geodynamics of the low- to high-grade transition zone of peninsular India , 1992 .

[23]  B. Ramalingeswara Rao Historical seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian Peninsular Shield , 2000 .

[24]  H. Bungum,et al.  Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: zoning free versus zoning methodology , 2001 .

[25]  Mohammad R. Zolfaghari Use of raster-based data layers to model spatial variation of seismotectonic data in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[26]  E. Smith,et al.  Adaptive Kernel Estimation and Continuous Probability Representation of Historical Earthquake Catalogs , 2002 .

[27]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[28]  E. L. Russell Statistics in the Environmental & Earth Sciences , 1992 .

[29]  I. Gupta Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighbourhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region , 2006 .

[30]  Mapping b‐values in France using two different magnitude ranges: Possible non power‐law behavior , 2003 .

[31]  K. Subrahmanya Active intraplate deformation in south India , 1996 .

[32]  C. R. Allen,et al.  Relationship between seismicity and geologic structure in the Southern California region , 1965 .

[33]  Polona Zupančič,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Methodology for Distributed Seismicity , 2003 .

[34]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[35]  U. Chandra Earthquakes of peninsular India—a seismotectonic study , 1977 .

[36]  B. Rao,et al.  Historical seismicity of Peninsular India , 1984 .

[37]  S. Lasocki,et al.  Seismic hazard assessment under complex source size distribution of mining-induced seismicity , 2008 .

[38]  G. Woo Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[39]  Euan G. C. Smith,et al.  Comparison of Seismicity Models Generated by Different Kernel Estimations , 2002 .