Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT Use of a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge (CHGIS) in intravascular catheter dressings may reduce catheter-related infections (CRIs). Changing catheter dressings every 3 days may be more frequent than necessary. OBJECTIVE To assess superiority of CHGIS dressings regarding the rate of major CRIs (clinical sepsis with or without bloodstream infection) and noninferiority (less than 3% colonization-rate increase) of 7-day vs 3-day dressing changes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Assessor-blind, 2 x 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial conducted from December 2006 through June 2008 and recruiting patients from 7 intensive care units in 3 university and 2 general hospitals in France. Patients were adults (>18 years) expected to require an arterial catheter, central-vein catheter, or both inserted for 48 hours or longer. INTERVENTIONS Use of CHGIS vs standard dressings (controls). Scheduled change of unsoiled adherent dressings every 3 vs every 7 days, with immediate change of any soiled or leaking dressings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Major CRIs for comparison of CHGIS vs control dressings; colonization rate for comparison of 3- vs 7-day dressing changes. RESULTS Of 2095 eligible patients, 1636 (3778 catheters, 28,931 catheter-days) could be evaluated. The median duration of catheter insertion was 6 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-10) days. There was no interaction between the interventions. Use of CHGIS dressings decreased the rates of major CRIs (10/1953 [0.5%], 0.6 per 1000 catheter-days vs 19/1825 [1.1%], 1.4 per 1000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.39 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.17-0.93]; P = .03) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (6/1953 catheters, 0.40 per 1000 catheter-days vs 17/1825 catheters, 1.3 per 1000 catheter-days; HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09-0.65]). Use of CHGIS dressings was not associated with greater resistance of bacteria in skin samples at catheter removal. Severe CHGIS-associated contact dermatitis occurred in 8 patients (5.3 per 1000 catheters). Use of CHGIS dressings prevented 1 major CRI per 117 catheters. Catheter colonization rates were 142 of 1657 catheters (7.8%) in the 3-day group (10.4 per 1000 catheter-days) and 168 of 1828 catheters (8.6%) in the 7-day group (11.0 per 1000 catheter-days), a mean absolute difference of 0.8% (95% CI, -1.78% to 2.15%) (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.28), indicating noninferiority of 7-day changes. The median number of dressing changes per catheter was 4 (IQR, 3-6) in the 3-day group and 3 (IQR, 2-5) in the 7-day group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Use of CHGIS dressings with intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit reduced risk of infection even when background infection rates were low. Reducing the frequency of changing unsoiled adherent dressings from every 3 days to every 7 days modestly reduces the total number of dressing changes and appears safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00417235.

[1]  K. Ho,et al.  Comment on: Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[2]  P. Gastmeier,et al.  Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial , 2009, Annals of Hematology.

[3]  T. Perl,et al.  Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  J. Timsit Diagnosis and prevention of catheter-related infections , 2007, Current opinion in critical care.

[5]  A Lepape,et al.  European surveillance of ICU-acquired infections (HELICS-ICU): methods and main results. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  P. Ganly,et al.  Reduction of exit-site infections of tunnelled intravascular catheters among neutropenic patients by sustained-release chlorhexidine dressings: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2005, The Journal of hospital infection.

[8]  Z. Samra,et al.  Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Dressing for Prevention of Colonization of Central Venous Catheters in Infants and Children: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2005, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[9]  J. Bion,et al.  The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states’ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  Shubhangi Bhende,et al.  In Vitro Assessment of Chlorhexidine Gluconate–Impregnated Polyurethane Foam Antimicrobial Dressing Using Zone of Inhibition Assays , 2004, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  J. Fuhr,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Dressing in the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections , 2004, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  R. Leclercq,et al.  Alcoholic povidone-iodine to prevent central venous catheter colonization: A randomized unit-crossover study* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[13]  H. Rüden,et al.  Reducing Central Venous Catheter–Associated Primary Bloodstream Infections in Intensive Care Units Is Possible: Data From The German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System , 2003, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[14]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Analysis and reporting of factorial trials: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  J. Timsit Réactualisation de la douzième conférence de consensus de la Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) : infections liées aux cathéters veineux centraux en réanimation ☆ , 2003 .

[16]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[17]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  J. Timsit Central venous access in intensive care unit patients: is the subclavian vein the royal route? , 2002, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  C. Comnougue,et al.  Less frequent catheter dressing changes decrease local cutaneous toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy in children, without increasing the rate of catheter-related infections: results of a randomised trial , 2002, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[20]  Jeanne E. Zack,et al.  Effect of an education program on decreasing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the surgical intensive care unit , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[21]  F Golliot,et al.  Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[22]  C. Brun-Buisson,et al.  Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  D. Goldmann,et al.  A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[24]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2001, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[25]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections , 2001, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[26]  D. Pittet,et al.  Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care , 2000, The Lancet.

[27]  Leonard Mermel,et al.  Prevention of Intravascular CatheterRelated Infections , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  C. Brun-Buisson,et al.  Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures , 1999, The Lancet.

[29]  S. Saint,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection. , 1999, JAMA.

[30]  S Chevret,et al.  Attributable Morbidity and Mortality of Catheter-Related Septicemia in Critically Ill Patients: a Matched, Risk-Adjusted, Cohort Study , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[31]  O. Wenker,et al.  A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance , 1999, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[33]  F. Gavini,et al.  Susceptibilities to antibiotics and antiseptics of new species of the family Enterobacteriaceae , 1988, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[34]  P. Legrand,et al.  Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  M Rapin,et al.  Diagnosis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Sepsis: Critical Level of Quantitative Tip Cultures , 1987 .

[36]  M. Gail,et al.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. , 1985, Biometrics.

[37]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[38]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. , 2006, JAMA.

[39]  J. Timsit [Updating of the 12th consensus conference of the Société de Réanimation de langue française (SRLF): catheter related infections in the intensive care unit]. , 2005, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[40]  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. , 2004, American journal of infection control.

[41]  ohn,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TWO ANTIMICROBIAL-IMPREGNATED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS , 2000 .

[42]  S. Boschi,et al.  Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study. The Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO). , 2000, Haematologica.

[43]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  Cox-Type Regression Analysis for Large Numbers of Small Groups of Correlated Failure Time Observations , 1992 .

[44]  S. Fregert,et al.  Terminology of contact dermatitis. , 1970, Acta dermato-venereologica.