Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging.

INTRODUCTION Our objective was to determine the diagnostic capability of panoramic imaging in any of its forms to detect mandibular asymmetry. METHODS Several electronic databases were searched. Abstracts that appeared to fulfill the initial selection criteria (mandibular or craniofacial asymmetry, panoramic imaging, and evaluation of validity or accuracy of diagnosis with an appropriate gold standard) were selected, and full articles from these abstracts were gathered. The references from these articles were also examined for possible articles that could have been missed. RESULTS Only 11 articles met all criteria. Vertical measurements, although more accurate than horizontal or angular measurements, are still not true representations of the real objects they correspond to. Magnification values reported by the manufacturer might not correspond to the calculated magnification value and be uniform across the panoramic imaging entire area. CONCLUSIONS Caution is advised when using conventional or digital panoramic images to assess mandibular asymmetry. Understanding the limitations of every form of panoramic imaging is required. Future studies with panoramic images generated from 3-dimensional data are required to determine whether they overcome the limitations of conventional and digital panoramic images.

[1]  B. Friedland Clinical radiological issues in orthodontic practice. , 1998, Seminars in orthodontics.

[2]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  D B Svanaes,et al.  Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  F. Krummenauer,et al.  Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  A. Čelebić,et al.  Dimensional measurements on the human dental panoramic radiographs. , 1998, Collegium antropologicum.

[6]  A. Čelebić,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  M. Su Facial asymmetry. The diagnostic challenge. , 1996 .

[8]  Allan G Farman Panoramic radiographic images and the prediction of asymmetry. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  L. Sillanmäki,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry in healthy children , 2005, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  J Wolf,et al.  Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  T. Graber Panoramic radiography in orthodontic diagnosis. , 1967, American journal of orthodontics.

[13]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[14]  M. Persson Mandibular asymmetry of hereditary origin. , 1973, American journal of orthodontics.

[15]  A. Raustia,et al.  Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry. , 1988, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  The Levandoski Panoramic Analysis in the diagnosis of facial and dental asymmetries. , 1995, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[18]  A. Volchansky,et al.  Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study. , 2006, Quintessence international.

[19]  W. Updegrave Visualizing the mandibular ramus in panoramic radiography. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[20]  F. Mongini,et al.  A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  M. Könönen,et al.  Vertical asymmetry of the mandibular ramus and condylar heights measured with a new method from dental panoramic radiographs in patients with psoriatic arthritis. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[22]  A Vissink,et al.  Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[23]  P. Petocz,et al.  The reliability of crown-root ratio, linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs. , 2000, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[24]  E. S. Alhaija Panoramic radiographs: determination of mandibular steepness. , 2005, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[25]  R. Tallents,et al.  Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[26]  M. Nunn,et al.  Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned- aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[27]  P. Petocz,et al.  Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[28]  P. Burke,et al.  Angular Distortion in the Orthopantomogram , 1984, British journal of orthodontics.

[29]  W. McDavid,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1982, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[30]  U Welander,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1981, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[31]  L Preda,et al.  Condylar-mandibular asymmetry, a reality. , 2002, Bulletin du Groupement international pour la recherche scientifique en stomatologie & odontologie.

[32]  A. Farman,et al.  Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[33]  W. McDavid,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1981, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[34]  P. Brockhurst,et al.  Distortions in panoramic radiographs. , 2002, Australian orthodontic journal.

[35]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Asymmetry of normal mandibular condylar shape. , 1997, Acta anatomica.

[36]  T. Hansson,et al.  The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification. , 1987, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[37]  A. Sağlam The condylar asymmetry measurements in different skeletal patterns. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[38]  A. Ekestubbe,et al.  Condylar height on panoramic radiographs. A methodologic study with a clinical application. , 1994, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[39]  T. Hansson,et al.  The recognition of craniomandibular disorders--a comparison between clinical, tomographical, and dental panoramic radiographical findings in thirty-one subjects. , 1988, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[40]  R. Schulze,et al.  [Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging]. , 2000, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie.

[41]  W. Vach,et al.  Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an Orthopantomogram--a valid method? , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.