Unterstützung der Adoption kommerzieller Standardsoftware durch Diagramme

[1]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[2]  P. Atteslander.  Methoden Der Empirischen Sozialforschung , 1999 .

[3]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Design as storytelling , 1996, INTR.

[4]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Making representations work , 1995, CACM.

[6]  Mark Pendergast,et al.  Supporting the group creation of formal and informal graphics during business process modeling , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Stephen J. Mellor,et al.  Object lifecycles: modeling the world in states , 1992 .

[8]  B. Craig Meyers,et al.  Managing Software Acquisition: Open Systems and COTS Products , 2001 .

[9]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective systems design and requirements analysis : the ETHICS approach , 1995 .

[10]  Karl J. Lieberherr,et al.  Object-oriented design , 1996, CSUR.

[11]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  COTS Integration: Plug and Pray? , 1999, Computer.

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Evolving the notes: organizational change around groupware technology , 1997 .

[13]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[14]  David Harel,et al.  Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems , 1987, Sci. Comput. Program..

[15]  Gill Smith,et al.  Object-oriented analysis , 1988, WADAS '88.

[16]  Joseph A. Goguen,et al.  Techniques for requirements elicitation , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[17]  Helen C. Purchase,et al.  Which Aesthetic has the Greatest Effect on Human Understanding? , 1997, GD.

[18]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[19]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Socio-technical walkthrough: designing technology along work processes , 2004, PDC 04.

[20]  Alexander Backlund.  The definition of system , 2000 .

[21]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Advice for an action researcher , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  COTS-Based Systems Top 10 List , 2001, Computer.

[23]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Software package requirements and procurement , 1996, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design.

[24]  Ed Downs,et al.  Structured systems analysis and design method: application and context , 1988 .

[25]  Daryl Kulak,et al.  Use cases: requirements in context , 2000, SOEN.

[26]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[27]  René-Marc Gille.  Diagramm-Editoren: Generierung aus objektorientierten Modellinformationen , 1999 .

[28]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Experiences using cooperative interactive storyboard prototyping , 1993, CACM.

[29]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  Wirtschaftsinformatik : Referenzmodelle für industrielle Geschäftsprozesse , 1995 .

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Dianne Willis,et al.  The New Sociotech: Graffiti on the Long Wall , 2000 .

[32]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The politics of design: representing work , 1995, CACM.

[33]  D. L. Flarey.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1994 .

[34]  Patricia K. Lawlis,et al.  A Formal Process for Evaluating COTS Software Products , 2001, Computer.

[35]  A. Scheer,et al.  Making ERP a Success. , 2000 .

[36]  James Martin,et al.  Information Engineering, Book I: Introduction , 1989 .

[37]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Modellierungsnotationen für prospektive, gestaltungsorientierte Technikfolgenforschung , 1998 .

[38]  Heinz von Foerster,et al.  Thoughts and Notes on Cognition , 2003 .

[39]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Using the CARD and PICTIVE participatory design methods for collaborative analysis , 1996 .

[40]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[41]  KleinMark,et al.  Tools for Inventing Organizations , 1999 .

[42]  Niklas Luhmann.  Interpenetration — Zum Verhältnis personaler und sozialer Systeme , 1981 .

[43]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Modelling Cooperative Work: Chances and Risks of Structuring , 2002, COOP.

[45]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[46]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[47]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Semistructured Models are Surprisingly Useful for User-Centered Design , 2000, COOP.

[48]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[49]  Stein Bråten.  Model Monopoly and Communication: Systems Theoretical Notes On Democratization , 1973 .

[50]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[51]  Julius Morel,et al.  Soziologische Theorie: Abriss der Ansätze ihrer Hauptvertreter , 2007 .

[52]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[53]  Kai-Uwe Loser,et al.  Intertwining Training and Participatory Design for the Development of Groupware Applications , 2000 .

[54]  Michael Paetau.  Self-organization of social systems—a new challenge for organization sciences and systems design , 1996, SIGO.

[55]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Sozio-orientierte und semi-strukturierte Modellierung mit SeeMe , 1998 .

[56]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  The organization of cooperative work: beyond the “Leviathan” conception of the organization of cooperative work , 1994, CSCW '94.

[57]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  MUST: A Method for Participatory Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[58]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Of maps and scripts—the status of formal constructs in cooperative work , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[59]  Robert F. Cohen,et al.  Validating Graph Drawing Aesthetics , 1995, GD.

[60]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Embedding computer-based critics in the contexts of design , 1993, INTERCHI.

[61]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[62]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  Architektur integrierter Informationssysteme , 1991 .

[63]  C. Floyd,et al.  Software Development and Reality Construction , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[64]  Michael J. Muller.  PICTIVE—an exploration in participatory design , 1991, CHI.

[65]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Flexible Präsentation von Prozeßmodellen , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[66]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research , 1999, ICIS.

[67]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[68]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[69]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  A design process for embedding knowledge management in everyday work , 1999, GROUP.

[70]  James Martin,et al.  Rapid Application Development , 1991 .

[71]  Elena Esposito,et al.  GLU : Glossar zu Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme , 1999 .

[72]  John E. Dobson,et al.  ORDIT: a new methodology to assist in the process of eliciting and modelling organizational requirements , 1993, COCS '93.

[73]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[74]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms , 1997, CACM.

[75]  Gábor Kiss.  Grundzüge und Entwicklung der Luhmannschen Systemtheorie , 1986 .

[76]  Bettina Schwarzer,et al.  Prozeßorientierte Unternehmensmodellierung — Gründe, Anforderungen an Werkzeuge und Folgen für die Organisation , 1994 .

[77]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[78]  Wolfgang Hesse,et al.  Terminologie der Softwaretechnik, Ein Begriffssystem für die Analyse und Modellierung von Anwendungssystemen, Teil 1: Begriffssystematik und Grundbegriffe , 1994, Inform. Spektrum.

[79]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Effective view navigation , 1997, CHI.

[80]  Keith A. Butler,et al.  Connecting the design of software to the design , 1999, CACM.

[81]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  A Participatory Design Technique for High-Level Task Analysis, Critique, and Redesign: The CARD Method , 1993 .

[82]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[83]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[84]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[85]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  The OPEN toolbox of techniques , 1998 .

[86]  Wolfgang Krohn,et al.  Emergenz : die Entstehung von Ordnung, Organisation und Bedeutung , 1992 .

[87]  Doris Schmedding,et al.  Metriken für UML-Modelle , 2003, Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung.

[88]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design , 1992 .

[89]  H. Foerster,et al.  Wissen und Gewissen : Versuch einer Brücke , 1993 .

[90]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[91]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[92]  J. Gregory,et al.  Contextualizing Power in a Collaborative Design Project , 2003 .

[93]  Christiane Floyd,et al.  Softwareentwicklung als Realitätskonstruktion , 1989, Software-Entwicklung.

[94]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[95]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design , 2004, Commun. ACM.

[96]  Marcel Hoffmann.  Awareness und Adoption kooperativer Wissensmedien im Kontext informeller Zusammenarbeit , 2004 .

[97]  Humberto R. Maturana,et al.  Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit , 1985 .

[98]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach , 1997 .

[99]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[100]  Claire Dormann,et al.  Practical guidelines for the readability of IT-architecture diagrams , 2002, SIGDOC '02.

[101]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[102]  K. Fishkin,et al.  The movable filter as a user interface tool , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[103]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Requirements engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[104]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[105]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Multisite ERP Implementations. , 2000 .

[106]  S. Schmidt.  Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus , 1987 .

[107]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[108]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Modellieren mit SeeMe - Alternativen wider die Trockenlegung feuchter Informationslandschaften , 1999, Modellierung.

[109]  D. Mills.  Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change , 2000 .

[110]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The object advantage - business process reengineering with object technology , 1994 .

[111]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Questioning Representations , 1991, ECSCW.

[112]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Interaction and Transformation in SSM , 1996, ECIS.

[113]  Enid Mumford,et al.  A Socio-Technical Approach to Systems Design , 2000, Requirements Engineering.

[114]  Lisa Brownsword,et al.  Developing New Processes for COTS-Based Systems , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[115]  Thomas Walter,et al.  The Relevance of Showcases for the Participative Improvement of Business Processes and Workflow- Management , 2001 .

[116]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[117]  Francis Y. Lau,et al.  Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[118]  Iris Vessey,et al.  CASE tools as collaborative support technologies , 1995, CACM.

[119]  David Harel,et al.  On visual formalisms , 1988, CACM.

[120]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: design for designers , 2000, DIS '00.

[121]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  The Three Dimensions of Requirements Engineering , 1993, CAiSE.

[122]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[123]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Acquiring COTS software selection requirements , 1998, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering: RE '98.

[124]  J. Goguen.  Requirements Engineering as the Reconciliation of Technical and Social Issues , 1994 .

[125]  George J. Klir,et al.  Facets of Systems Science , 1991 .

[126]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[127]  Michael Foster.  An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Action Research in Work Organizations , 1972 .

[128]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Enabling factors for participatory design of socio-technical systems with diagrams , 2002 .

[129]  Humberto Maturana Romesín.  The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization , 1975, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[130]  Hermann Kaindl,et al.  Symbolic modeling in practice , 1999, CACM.

[131]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Sociotechnical Walkthrough - ein methodischer Beitrag zur Gestaltung soziotechnischer Systeme , 2002, Mensch & Computer.

[132]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Process-Centered Requirements Engineering , 1996 .

[133]  L. Bertalanffy.  Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre , 1972 .

[134]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Freeflow: mediating between representation and action in workflow systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[135]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Viewpoints: A Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspectives in System Development , 1992, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[136]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[137]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. , 1974, Currents in modern biology.

[138]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Setting the Stage for Design as Action , 1992 .

[139]  Terry Trickett,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[140]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Process Models: a help or a burden? , 1997 .

[141]  Rebecca Wirfs-Brock,et al.  Designing object-oriented software , 1990 .

[142]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[143]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[144]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users , 1991, Computer.

[145]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  From System Descriptions to Scripts for Action , 1992 .

[146]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information Systems Definition: The Multiview Approach , 1985 .