Bridging the Gap between Centrally Defined Policies and Local Decisions – Towards more Sensitive and Creative Rural Landscape Management

European policies and instruments such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and many instruments for nature and landscape conservation in Europe have for some decades been dominated by centralisation and standardisation. This paper shows that this has led to the neglect of contextual and place-related approaches and an unnecessarily high degree of over-simplification. Recently, as a reaction to this over-simplification, diversity and specific character has been particularly stressed in many European and national strategies for rural landscapes and conservation, but the processes of simplification still continue. Using examples from mixed agriculture and forestry landscapes in Portugal, Slovenia and Sweden, this paper aims to contribute to understanding the gap between centrally defined strategies for rural landscapes and awareness and management practices at local level. The three countries are situated at the outer fringes of Europe, and are complementary with their different degrees of urbanisation, forest distribution and tree-richness in the agricultural landscapes. Furthermore, the aim is to show how local landscape management is driven and to identify factors contributing to a better use of public policies through a participatory process with visions for the future. Systems of landscape classifications such as landscape character assessment often recognise the specific character of these landscapes, but have so far achieved very little for the preservation of their locally specific values, nor have they contributed to the development and the creation of new visions for future management. Such systems could contribute much more if they could be opened to adaptation on a more local scale in communication-led management planning.

[1]  David Hladnik,et al.  Spatial structure of disturbed landscapes in Slovenia , 2005 .

[2]  P. Selman,et al.  Barriers and bridges to sustaining cultural landscapes , 2004 .

[3]  Arnold Berleant,et al.  Living in the Landscape: Toward an Aesthetics of Environment , 1997 .

[4]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The Transition to Sustainability: The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe , 1998 .

[5]  G. Pedroli Landscape - our home; essays on the culture of the European landscape as a task / Lebensraum Landschaft; Essays über die Kultur der europäischen Landschaft als Aufgabe , 2000 .

[6]  N. G. Roling,et al.  A new practice: facilitating sustainable agriculture. , 1998 .

[7]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  Agri-environmental policy in the European Union. , 2000 .

[8]  Teresa Pinto-Correia,et al.  Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation? , 2000 .

[9]  David Baldock,et al.  Integration of environmental objectives into agricultural policy making. , 2000 .

[10]  Hannes Palang,et al.  The Forgotten Rural Landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  J. Pirnat Conservation and management of forest patches and corridors in suburban landscapes. , 2000 .

[12]  G. Wilson From productivism to post-productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture , 2001 .

[13]  B. Green,et al.  Threatened landscapes : conserving cultural environments , 2001 .

[14]  B. Ilbery The Geography of Rural Change , 1998 .

[15]  M. Albornoz Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[16]  A. Peterson,et al.  Authenticity in Landscape Conservation and Management — The Importance of the Local Context , 2003 .

[17]  E. Zemach Human understanding , 1992, Synthese.

[18]  S. Helmfrid Landscape and settlements , 1994 .

[19]  D. Baldock,et al.  Nature conservation and new directions in the EC Common Agricultural Policy : report for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, the Netherlands , 1993 .

[20]  Antoine Giacometti Living in the landscape , 2006 .

[21]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[22]  N. Ward,et al.  Participation in rural development : a review of european experience , 1998 .

[23]  L. Hulton,et al.  Strategies for National Sustainable Development: A Handbook for their Planning and Implementation , 1996 .

[24]  T. Pinto-Correia,et al.  Multifunctionality in Mediterranean landscapes: past and future , 2004 .

[25]  M. Whitby The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and Prospects for Conservation , 1996 .

[26]  W. Dramstad,et al.  Agricultural impacts on landscapes: Developing indicators for policy analysis - Proceedings from NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape Indicators in Oslo, Norway October 7-9, 2002. , 2003 .

[27]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Framework for analysing environmental policy integration , 2003 .

[28]  B. Pedroli,et al.  From Hiking Through Farmland to Farming in a Leisure Landscape: Changing Social Perceptions of the European Landscape , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  Regional Distribution of Landscape Types in Slovenia and Outstanding Landscapes of Slovenia , 2001 .

[30]  I. Heyman Tolkning och reflektion , 1996 .

[31]  K. Hagedorn Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change , 2002 .

[32]  M. Déjeant-Pons The European Landscape Convention , 2006 .

[33]  Stephen Stec,et al.  Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters , 1999, International Legal Materials.

[34]  Emily Brady Aesthetics of the Natural Environment , 2003 .