Vascular measurements correlate with estrogen receptor status

BackgroundBreast carcinoma can be classified as either Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive or negative by immunohistochemical phenotyping, although ER expression may vary from 1 to 100% of malignant cells within an ER + tumor. This is similar to genetic variability observed in other tumor types and is generally viewed as a consequence of intratumoral evolution driven by random genetic mutations. Here we view cellular evolution within tumors as a classical Darwinian system in which variations in molecular properties represent predictable adaptations to spatially heterogeneous environmental selection forces. We hypothesize that ER expression is a successful adaptive strategy only if estrogen is present in the microenvironment. Since the dominant source of estrogen is blood flow, we hypothesized that, in general, intratumoral regions with higher blood flow would contain larger numbers of ER + cells when compared to areas of low blood flow and in turn necrosis.MethodsThis study used digital pathology whole slide image acquisition and advanced image analysis algorithms. We examined the spatial distribution of ER + and ER- cells, vascular density, vessel area, and tissue necrosis within histological sections of 24 breast cancer specimens. These data were correlated with the patients ER status and molecular pathology report findings.ResultsANOVA analyses revealed a strong correlation between vascular area and ER expression and between high fractional necrosis and absent ER expression (R2 = 39%; p < 0.003 and R2 = 46%; p < 0.001), respectively). ER expression did not correlate with tumor grade or size.ConclusionWe conclude that ER expression can be understood as a Darwinian process and linked to variations in estrogen delivery by temporal and spatial heterogeneity in blood flow. This correlation suggests strategies to promote intratumoral blood flow or a cyclic introduction of estrogen in the treatment schedule could be explored as a counter-intuitive approach to increase the efficacy of anti-estrogen drugs.

[1]  I. Ellis,et al.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[2]  P. Neven,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  S. Edge,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2005 .

[4]  J. Gustafsson,et al.  The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biology and therapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  Robert A Gatenby,et al.  Riparian ecosystems in human cancers , 2012, Evolutionary applications.

[6]  A. Qureshi,et al.  Allred scoring for ER reporting and it's impact in clearly distinguishing ER negative from ER positive breast cancers. , 2010, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[7]  James P. Freyer,et al.  A Cellular Model for Avascular Tumor Growth , 2002 .

[8]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Vaupel Hypoxia in neoplastic tissue. , 1977, Microvascular research.

[10]  R. Jain Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[11]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  S. Safe,et al.  Hypoxia induces proteasome-dependent degradation of estrogen receptor alpha in ZR-75 breast cancer cells. , 2002, Molecular endocrinology.

[13]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Intratumor Heterogeneity , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[15]  René Bernards,et al.  Cancer: Cues for migration , 2003, Nature.

[16]  J. Liehr Is Estradiol a Genotoxic Mutagenic Carcinogen ? * , 2000 .

[17]  I. Jacobs,et al.  Genetic intra‐tumour heterogeneity in epithelial ovarian cancer and its implications for molecular diagnosis of tumours , 2007, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss,et al.  Angiopoietin-2 overexpression in morris hepatoma results in increased tumor perfusion and induction of critical angiogenesis-promoting genes. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  F. Jacob The Logic of Life , 2022 .

[20]  Baogang J. Xu,et al.  Variability of in situ proteomic profiling and implications for study design in colorectal tumors. , 2007, International journal of oncology.

[21]  C. Swanton Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time. , 2012, Cancer research.

[22]  A. Harris,et al.  Necrosis correlates with high vascular density and focal macrophage infiltration in invasive carcinoma of the breast , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  M. Lloret,et al.  Effect of cervical spinal cord stimulation on regional blood flow and oxygenation in advanced head and neck tumours. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[25]  Irma H. Russo,et al.  The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer , 2006, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[26]  M. Osborne,et al.  The Role of Estrogen in Mammary Carcinogenesis a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  K Vajda,et al.  [Prognostic factors in breast cancer]. , 1998, Orvosi hetilap.

[28]  L. Belghiti,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2002 .

[29]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Modification of Hypoxia-Induced Radioresistance in Tumors by the Use of Oxygen and Sensitizers. , 1996, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[30]  H. Stevenson,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Determinants of Estrogen Receptor Expression , 2004 .

[31]  R. Beroukhim,et al.  Molecular definition of breast tumor heterogeneity. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[32]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Increased survival of glioblastoma patients who respond to antiangiogenic therapy with elevated blood perfusion. , 2012, Cancer research.

[33]  A. Lee,et al.  Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1992, Human pathology.

[34]  K. Korach,et al.  Catechol estrogen metabolites and conjugates in mammary tumors and hyperplastic tissue from estrogen receptor-alpha knock-out (ERKO)/Wnt-1 mice: implications for initiation of mammary tumors. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.

[35]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[36]  Satoru Takahashi,et al.  High estrogen receptor expression and low Ki67 expression are associated with improved time to progression during first-line endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer , 2011, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  J. Yager,et al.  Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.