Low compliance with a validated system for emergency department triage.

INTRODUCTION Bispebjerg Hospital has introduced a triage system at the Emergency Department (ED) based on "primary criteria" and a physiological scoring system named the Bispebjerg Early Warning Score (BEWS). A BEWS is calculated on the basis of five vital signs which are accessible bedside. Patients who have a "primary criterion" or a BEWS ≥ 5 are presumed to be critically ill or severely injured and should be received by a multidisciplinary team, termed the Emergency Call (EC) and Trauma Call (TC), respectively. The aim of this study was to examine compliance with this triage system at Bispebjerg Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective evaluation of the triage of a random sample of 300 ED patients. ED medical charts were searched for "primary criteria", documentation of vital signs and a BEWS score. If a BEWS score had not been calculated, this was done retrospectively by the author. An evaluation was made to determine whether ECs or TCs had been correctly activated. RESULTS In 47 patients, all five vital signs for calculation of a BEWS had been documented. A BEWS had been calculated in 22 patients. Nine patients had a TC activation criterion, and in all these cases a TC was activated. A total of 48 patients had an EC activation criterion, but an EC had only been activated in 24 patients. Among the 24 patients for whom an EC had not been activated, eight had a "primary criterion" and 16 patients had a retrospective BEWS ≥ 5. CONCLUSION The triage system is not being used systematically and documentation of vital signs is insufficient at Bispebjerg Hospital. As a consequence, many patients who are presumed to be critically ill are not allocated to an EC. Initiatives have been taken to raise compliance with the system.

[1]  P. Yarnold,et al.  Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  Bo Belhage,et al.  Nurse-administered early warning score system can be used for emergency department triage , 2011 .

[3]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  M. Cooke,et al.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill? , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[5]  D. Goldhill,et al.  Physiological values and procedures in the 24 h before ICU admission from the ward , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[6]  P. Myles,et al.  Outcome of emergency department patients with delayed admission to an intensive care unit. , 2002, Emergency medicine.

[7]  A. McGinley,et al.  A physiologically‐based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score and outcome * , 2005, Anaesthesia.

[8]  D. Goldhill,et al.  The critically ill: following your MEWS. , 2001, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[9]  C. Mann,et al.  Use of the patient at risk scores in the emergency department: a preliminary study , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[10]  D. Eitel,et al.  The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  R. Paterson,et al.  Prediction of in-hospital mortality and length of stay using an early warning scoring system: clinical audit. , 2006, Clinical medicine.