A detailed 3D finite element analysis of the peeling behaviour of a gecko spatula

This paper presents a detailed finite element analysis of the adhesion of a gecko spatula. The gecko spatulae form the tips of the gecko foot hairs that transfer the adhesional and frictional forces between substrate and foot. The analysis is based on a parameterised description of the 3D geometry of the spatula that only requires 12 parameters. The adhesion is described by a nonlinear computational contact formulation that accounts for the van der Waals interaction between spatula and substrate. The spatula adhesion model is implemented using an enriched contact finite element formulation recently developed by the first author. The finite element model is then used to simulate the peeling behaviour of the gecko spatula under applied vertical and rotational loading for various model parameters. Variations of the material stiffness, adhesional strength and range, stiction, spatula size and spatula inclination are considered to account for the natural variation of spatula properties. The study demonstrates that the spatula can function over a wide range of conditions. The computed pull-off forces are in agreement with experimental results reported in the literature. The study also examines the energy required for the spatula pull-off. The proposed model is ideal to study the influence of substrate roughness on the spatula adhesion, as is finally demonstrated.

[1]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[2]  N. Rizzo,et al.  Characterization of the structure and composition of gecko adhesive setae , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  P. Wriggers,et al.  Multi-scale Approach for Frictional Contact of Elastomers on Rough Rigid Surfaces , 2009 .

[4]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[5]  Shaofan Li,et al.  An atomistically enriched continuum model for nanoscale contact mechanics and its application to contact scaling. , 2008, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[6]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Formulation and analysis of a three-dimensional finite element implementation for adhesive contact at the nanoscale , 2009 .

[7]  Pavel Neuzil,et al.  The nature of the gecko lizard adhesive force. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A contact mechanics model for quasi‐continua , 2007 .

[9]  Jae-Seob Kwak,et al.  A review of adhesion and friction models for gecko feet , 2010 .

[10]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[11]  Roger A Sauer,et al.  Multiscale modelling and simulation of the deformation and adhesion of a single gecko seta , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A Computational Model for Nanoscale Adhesion between Deformable Solids and Its Application to Gecko Adhesion , 2010 .

[13]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Enriched contact finite elements for stable peeling computations , 2011 .

[15]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix , 1993 .

[18]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  The Peeling Behavior of Thin Films with Finite Bending Stiffness and the Implications on Gecko Adhesion , 2011 .

[19]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  C. Bischof Adhesion and Friction , 1991 .

[22]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  Computational Contact Formulations for Soft Body Adhesion , 2012 .