Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology

A. Evered and N. Dudding

[1]  Kristine A. Erps,et al.  Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. , 2009, Human pathology.

[2]  Syed Z. Ali,et al.  Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology , 2001, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[3]  Samar Betmouni,et al.  What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[4]  M. Desai,et al.  The revised BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology , 2008, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[5]  A. Herbert,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology , 2007, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[6]  Sean SP Costello,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Virtual Pathology Slide: A New Tool in Telepathology , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  J. Woosley,et al.  Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents. , 2009, Human pathology.

[8]  Offline telepathology diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a study of interobserver agreement and comparison with glass slide diagnoses. , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Utility of 2-D and 3-D Virtual Microscopy in Cervical Cytology Education and Testing , 2007, Acta Cytologica.

[10]  P. Furness,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet‐based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy , 2007, Histopathology.