Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession

Abstract The extensive literature on executive succession gives only scant attention to the actual process of succession. To better understand the dynamics of the succession process, the analogy of a relay race is suggested, where success is influenced by four factors: sequence, timing, baton-passing technique, and communication. These four factors are used as a framework for a longitudinal examination of a failed executive succession in a small, family-owned manufacturing firm. In-depth examination of the attempted succession showed that the four themes are helpful in working toward the development of a general theory of executive succession.

[1]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Agenda Setting in Organizational Behavior , 1992 .

[2]  W. Handler,et al.  Succession in Family Firms: A Mutual Role Adjustment between Entrepreneur and Next-generation Family Members , 1990 .

[3]  L. Greiner Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow , 1997 .

[4]  W. Handler The Succession Experience of the Next Generation , 1992 .

[5]  N. Churchill,et al.  The Five Stages of Small Business Growth , 1983 .

[6]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  Important Attributes of Successors in Family Businesses: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[7]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Correlates of success in family business transitions , 1997 .

[8]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[9]  W. Dyer,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Exploring the Connections , 1994 .

[10]  Bill Wooldridge,et al.  Self-Confidence and Managerial Autonomy: Successor Characteristics Critical to Succession in Family Firms , 1993 .

[11]  John J. Gabarro,et al.  The dynamics of taking charge , 1987 .

[12]  H. Tsoukas The Missing Link: A Transformational View of Metaphors in Organizational Science , 1991 .

[13]  R. L. Osborne,et al.  Second‐Generation Entrepreneurs: Passing the Baton in the Privately Held Company , 1991 .

[14]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Bernard Barry,et al.  The Development of Organisation Structure in the Family Firm , 1975 .

[16]  John A. Davis,et al.  The Influence of Life Stage on Father-Son Work Relationships in Family Companies , 1989 .

[17]  Terrence C. Sebora,et al.  Executive Succession: Past, Present & Future , 1994 .

[18]  James N. Vedder How much can we learn from success , 1992 .

[19]  T. Brink The Hero's Farewell: What Happens When CEOs Retire? , 1990 .

[20]  Robert P. Gephart,et al.  Status Degradation and Organizational Succession: An Ethnomethodological Approach. , 1978 .

[21]  S. Bell,et al.  Track and Field: An Administrative Approach to the Science of Coaching. , 1978 .

[22]  M. Wortman Theoretical Foundations for Family-Owned Business: A Conceptual and Research-Based Paradigm , 1994 .

[23]  S. Friedman Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession , 1988 .

[24]  Louis B. Barnes,et al.  Transferring Power in the Family Business , 1989 .

[25]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .