On the Measurement of Patent Stock as Knowledge Indicators

Abstract Most of the conventional indicators for measuring the amount of technological knowledge (TK) have so far been input-based indicators. Hence, there is growing need to develop output-based indicators, and accordingly some studies have been conducted thereon. However, previous research has adopted patent count or patent stock by simple count in measuring the amount of TK as output-based indicators. The principal problem with using this variable is that the value of individual patent is too heterogeneous. That is a large portion of these patent databases are either of little value or nothing at all. As a result, patent count or patent stock by simple count cannot be seen as a suitable measure of TK. In this study, we attempted to resolve the value-heterogeneity problem in measuring patent stock. The notion of citation-based patent stock (CPS) and valuation-based patent stock (VPS) is proposed in this paper and the calculation method is described in detail. In CPS, the economic value of individual patent is assumed to be proportional to the number of citations received from other patents. And in VPS, the economic value of individual patent is derived from the value distribution of patents registered in some cohort by manipulating the patent renewal data. We validated the indicators by comparing them with the usual input-based indicators and by analyzing the relationships between them and the productivity growth empirically.

[1]  A. A. Kayal,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of the pace of technological progress in superconductor technology , 1999 .

[2]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[3]  Myung-Hwan Rim,et al.  Measuring Economic Externalities of IT and R&D , 2005 .

[4]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[5]  Norihisa Sakurai,et al.  Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion , 1998 .

[6]  Yongtae Park,et al.  A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: procedure and application , 2004 .

[7]  M. Tushman,et al.  Managing through Cycles of Technological Change , 1991 .

[8]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[9]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms , 2001 .

[10]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[11]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[12]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[13]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing , 1980 .

[14]  Saul Lach,et al.  Patents and productivity growth at the industry level: A first look , 1995 .

[15]  Giorgio Sirilli,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring technological innovation , 1998 .

[16]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-industry technology flows in the United States , 1993 .

[17]  Richard J. Sullivan.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Great Britain and Ireland, 1852-1876 , 1994 .

[18]  Yongtae Park,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Inter-industrial Spillover Effect of Information and Communications Technology on Cost and Labor - The Case of Korea , 2003 .

[19]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[20]  M.M.S. Karki,et al.  Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool , 1997 .

[21]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany , 1996 .

[22]  A. Kayal,et al.  Measuring the Pace of Technological Progress , 1999 .

[23]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2001 .

[24]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[25]  R. Tijssen.  Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[26]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[27]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[28]  Akira Goto,et al.  R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries , 1989 .

[29]  Francis Narin,et al.  Technological performance assessments based on patents and patent citations , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[31]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: an Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality , 1986 .

[32]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[33]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[34]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[35]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[36]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[37]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and the Productivity Slowdown , 1980 .

[38]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[39]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[40]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[41]  Megan MacGarvie,et al.  The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations , 2005 .

[42]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .