An industrial area layout design methodology considering piping and safety using genetic algorithm

Abstract The industrial area layout can influence the economic benefit, safety and surrounding environment of an industrial area to a large extent, especially the length of piping and safety. Every year, the construction of new industrial areas requires thousands of tons of steel pipes, resulting in a high consumption of natural resource of iron and high emission of carbon dioxide. Additionally, the long pipeline will increase the energy consumption for material transportation. Meanwhile, accidents in industrial areas can usually result in serious damage to the local environment. So the optimization of industrial area layout holds great significance for natural resource, energy saving, and environment protection. But up to now, very few papers have been reported to consider the use of pipes and safety simultaneously to optimize the layout in industrial area level. Most works only focus on safety aspects, and the impact of connection is ignored. Accordingly, this paper proposes a methodology to optimize the relative position of each plant, whose objective function consists of piping cost and safety cost. In this paper, despite conventional consideration of material piping, steam piping, which features multiple-branches connected pipeline network, is also considered. For safety issues, it is firstly analyzed by qualitative principles to limit position for some specified plants. Then quantitative analysis, including explosion and toxic release, are optimized simultaneously with connection cost. A genetic algorithm is used to solve the proposed model. Kruskal algorithm and Arrangement & Combination are used to calculate the length of steam piping. Finally, a case study illustrates the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed methodology.

[1]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities , 1957 .

[2]  Dongil Shin,et al.  Optimal multi-floor plant layout with consideration of safety distance based on mathematical programming and modified consequence analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Hui Wang,et al.  Quantitative area risk assessment and safety planning on chemical industry parks , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE).

[4]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  An MILP Approach to Safe Process Plant Layout , 2004 .

[5]  Zheng Yu-qian Safety risk assessment of chemical industry park based on grid partition and information diffusion , 2010 .

[6]  José Luiz de Medeiros,et al.  Optimal determination of chemical plant layout via minimization of risk to general public using Monte Carlo and Simulated Annealing techniques , 2016 .

[7]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A mathematical programming model for optimal layout considering quantitative risk analysis , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Frank Pearson Lees,et al.  Loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control , 1980 .

[9]  Shah Md. Toufiqur Rahman,et al.  Facility layout optimization of an ammonia plant based on risk and economic analysis , 2014 .

[10]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  Safety-based Process Plant Layout Using Genetic Algorithms , 2015 .

[11]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An inherently safer layout design for the liquefaction process of an FLNG plant , 2016 .

[12]  En Sup Yoon,et al.  Optimal Layout of a Chemical Process Plant to Minimize the Risk to Humans , 2013, KES.

[13]  A. R. Ciric,et al.  An MINLP Approach for Safe Process Plant Layout , 1996 .

[14]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Guobao Song,et al.  Risk Assessment and Hierarchical Risk Management of Enterprises in Chemical Industrial Parks Based on Catastrophe Theory , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Yan Wu,et al.  A chemical industry area-wide layout design methodology for piping implementation , 2017 .

[18]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A MINLP approach for layout designs based on the domino hazard index , 2014 .

[19]  Yufei Wang,et al.  A heuristic approach for petrochemical plant layout considering steam pipeline length , 2016 .

[20]  Zhenyu Wang,et al.  An Improved Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Chemical Plant Layout Optimization with Novel Non-overlapping and Toxic Gas Dispersion Constraints , 2013 .

[21]  Changsheng Qu,et al.  Mapping human vulnerability to chemical accidents in the vicinity of chemical industry parks. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Energy and environment efficiency of industry and its productivity effect , 2016 .

[23]  Wan Bin,et al.  CO2 emissions from China's iron and steel industry , 2016 .