Genome size, quantitative genetics and the genomic basis for flower size evolution in Silene latifolia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The overall goal of this paper is to construct an overview of the genetic basis for flower size evolution in Silene latifolia. It aims to examine the relationship between the molecular bases for flower size and the underlying assumption of quantitative genetics theory that quantitative variation is ultimately due to the impact of a number of structural genes. SCOPE Previous work is reviewed on the quantitative genetics and potential for response to selection on flower size, and the relationship between flower size and nuclear DNA content in S. latifolia. These earlier findings provide a framework within which to consider more recent analyses of a joint quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of flower size and DNA content in this species. KEY RESULTS Flower size is a character that fits the classical quantitative genetics model of inheritance very nicely. However, an earlier finding that flower size is correlated with nuclear DNA content suggested that quantitative aspects of genome composition rather than allelic substitution at structural loci might play a major role in the evolution of flower size. The present results reported here show that QTL for flower size are correlated with QTL for DNA content, further corroborating an earlier result and providing additional support for the conclusion that localized variations in DNA content underlie evolutionary changes in flower size. CONCLUSIONS The search image for QTL should be broadened to include overall aspects of genome regulation. As we prepare to enter the much-heralded post-genomic era, we also need to revisit our overall models of the relationship between genotype and phenotype to encompass aspects of genome structure and composition beyond structural genes.

[1]  D. Hartl Molecular melodies in high and low C , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  W. Göhde,et al.  Sex determination in dioecious plants Melandrium album and M. rubrum using high-resolution flow cytometry. , 1995, Cytometry.

[3]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  M. Purugganan,et al.  Candidate Genes, Quantitative Trait Loci, and Functional Trait Evolution in Plants , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[5]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes , 2002, Heredity.

[6]  J. P. Grime Plant Classification for Ecological Purposes: is there a Role for Genome Size? , 1998 .

[7]  D. Costich,et al.  ‘Junk’ DNA and long–term phenotypic evolution in Silene section Elisanthe (Caryophyllaceae) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Richard C. Moore,et al.  The sex chromosomes of Silene latifolia revisited and revised. , 2003, Genetics.

[9]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Repetitive DNA Elements as a Major Component of Plant Genomes , 1998 .

[10]  Jaroslav Dolezel,et al.  Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[11]  T. Meagher,et al.  Selection on floral characters in natural Spanish populations of Silene latifolia , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[12]  R. Shaw MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD APPROACHES APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  J. Doyle,et al.  Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue , 1990 .

[14]  M. Bulmer The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics , 1981 .

[15]  D. Ye,et al.  Karyotyping Melandrium album, a dioecious plant with heteromorphic sex chromosomes , 1990 .

[16]  M. Kearsey,et al.  QTL analysis in plants; where are we now? , 1998, Heredity.

[17]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Genomes, genes and junk: the large-scale organization of plant chromosomes , 1998 .

[18]  T. Gregory,et al.  Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cellsize, and the C‐value enigma , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  D. Costich,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in nuclear DNA content and floral morphology in populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae) , 1994 .

[20]  R. Frankham Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn): by Douglas S. Falconer and Trudy F.C. Mackay Longman, 1996. £24.99 pbk (xv and 464 pages) ISBN 0582 24302 5 , 1996 .

[21]  M. Westergaard The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. , 1958, Advances in genetics.

[22]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  C-banded karyotypes of two Silene species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes. , 2002, Genome.

[23]  Jonathan Flint,et al.  Finding the molecular basis of quatitative traits: successes and pitfalls , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  T. Meagher THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SILENE LATIFOLIA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE). I. GENETIC VARIATION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  D. Costich,et al.  Nuclear DNA content and floral evolution in Silene latifolia , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  H. Price,et al.  Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Leaves Contain Compounds that Reduce Nuclear Propidium Iodide Fluorescence , 2000 .

[27]  T. Meagher The Quantitative Genetics of Sexual Dimorphism , 1999 .

[28]  H. Price,et al.  Influence of light on DNA content of Helianthus annuus Linnaeus. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Francis Galton: Pioneer of Heredity and Biometry , 2003 .

[30]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[31]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[32]  D. Falconer Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .

[33]  A. Rogers,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN HUMAN BODY SIZE , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Plant retrotransposons. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.

[35]  A. Vinogradov Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Ben Hui Liu,et al.  Statistical Genomics: Linkage, Mapping, and QTL Analysis , 1997 .