An accurate method for correction of head movement in PET

A method is presented to correct positron emission tomography (PET) data for head motion during data acquisition. The method is based on simultaneous acquisition of PET data in list mode and monitoring of the patient's head movements with a motion tracking system. According to the measured head motion, the line of response (LOR) of each single detected PET event is spatially transformed, resulting in a spatially fully corrected data set. The basic algorithm for spatial transformation of LORs is based on a number of assumptions which can lead to spatial artifacts and quantitative inaccuracies in the resulting images. These deficiencies are discussed, demonstrated and methods for improvement are presented. Using different kinds of phantoms the validity and accuracy of the correction method is tested and its applicability to human studies is demonstrated as well.

[1]  Jesper L. R. Andersson,et al.  How to obtain high-accuracy image registration: application to movement correction of dynamic positron emission tomography data , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .

[4]  W J McKay,et al.  Head movement in normal subjects during simulated brain imaging. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[5]  Roger Fulton,et al.  Correction of Head Movement Using an Optical Motion Tracking System during PET in a Rhesus Monkey , 2002 .

[6]  Roger Fulton,et al.  Correction for head movements in positron emission tomography using an optical motion tracking system , 2000 .

[7]  Y. Picard,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[8]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Urs E. Ruttimann,et al.  Head motion during positron emission tomography: is it significant? , 1995, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[11]  M. S. Atkins,et al.  Compensation methods for head motion detected during PET imaging , 1996 .

[12]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  A New Method for Correcting Head Movement Artifact in Positron Emission Tomography , 2001 .

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  Roger Fulton,et al.  The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  T. Zeffiro,et al.  Head movement in normal subjects during simulated PET brain imaging with and without head restraint. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.