Problems with the Electronic Medical Record in Clinical Psychiatry: A Hidden Cost

200 May 2005 Bioinformatics (BI) have led to improved genomic research, education, clinical care, data collection, billing/collection, and cost analyses. The most elemental form of bioinformatics is medical informatics, the electronic medical record (EMR). The hybrid combination of bioinformatics in its purest biological form and medical informatics is now termed biomedical informatics (BMI).1,2 Healthcare is currently undergoing a revolutionary change from paper records to the EMR.3 The degree that the EMR is used varies from one country to another.4,5 For example, the EMR is extensively available for use by more than 80% of Danish general practitioners. Benefits are alleged savings, maximization of information with rapidity of access by all clinicians, multidisciplinary coordination of medical care, increased quality of care, evidenced based medical care, education, and research.6–11 Disadvantages include the significant cost to install and then maintain Information Technology Infrastructures (ITI).7,12 Cost-benefit analyses of EMR have shown both net costs and net profits.3,13,14 Other potential disadvantages involve security, confidentiality, provider liability, and data entry errors.2,3,15–17 In large multi-specialty groups, such as academic university medical groups, the EMR can be a strong tool in clinical care, education, and research. Nonetheless, each speciality’s needs are different. In the case of psychiatry, clinicians need to capture narrative reports as well as data. When narrative reports are critical, the issue of lost information as a result of using the EMR has been raised.18 Therefore, for a psychiatrist to use EMR, he or she must be a proficient typist and there needs to be an excellent ITI and minimal dysfunction in the system. When a psychiatrist uses an EMR, he or she already pays a heavy price in decreased eye contact and ability to judge body movements and a clear change in the psychiatrist-patient relationship, while typing and monitoring the computer, without also losing narrative data to a dysfunctional EMR. This report looks at the hidden costs associated with a dysfunctional EMR when used in a university psychiatric faculty practice clinic.

[1]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[2]  Victor Maojo,et al.  Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Gio Wiederhold Future of security and privacy in medical information. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors , 2005 .

[5]  John F Hurdle,et al.  Future history: medical informatics in geriatrics. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[6]  R. Cushman,et al.  n Serious Technology Assessment for Health Care Information Technology , 2022 .

[7]  Fredrick D. Ashbury,et al.  The Impact of Computerized Clinical Reminders on Physician Prescribing Behavior: Evidence From Community Oncology Practice , 2003, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[8]  K. Kaufman Academic and Private Practice Medicine and Health Service Delivery Systems: A Psychiatric Commentary , 2000, Annals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists.

[9]  R. Wears,et al.  Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  J. van der Lei Closing the Loop between Clinical Practice, Research, and Education: The Potential of Electronic Patient Records , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  David W. Bates,et al.  Position Paper: A Proposal for Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Primary Care , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  A S Neubauer,et al.  [Electronic versus paper-based patient records: a cost-benefit analysis]. , 2001, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[13]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  S. Retchin,et al.  Electronic medical record systems at academic health centers: advantages and implementation issues. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  A. Albisser,et al.  Patient confidentiality, data security, and provider liabilities in diabetes management. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[17]  W. Sujansky,et al.  The benefits and challenges of an electronic medical record: much more than a "word-processed" patient chart. , 1998, The Western journal of medicine.

[18]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Patients' and physicians' understanding of health and biomedical concepts: relationship to the design of EMR systems , 2002, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  K. F. Schmitt,et al.  Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. , 2002, Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association.

[20]  Donald A B Lindberg Biomedical informatics: precious scientific resource and public policy dilemma. , 2003, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association.

[21]  Strickland Nh [The filmless hospital: 3-year experience at the Hammersmith Hospital, London]. , 1999 .