Does Focus Improve Operational Performance? Lessons from the Management of Clinical Trials

For over three decades, the benefits of operational focus have been touted under the guiding principle that dedicated attention to a subset of linked tasks will improve performance. The empirical evidence on the benefits of focus, however, is mixed. We explore the effect of operational focus by studying the investigative sites in biopharmaceutical clinical trials. Within a given trial, multiple investigative sites recruit eligible volunteers, enroll them into a common clinical protocol, and process them according to the same quality specifications. Because these sites vary substantially in their organizational structure, this setting allows us to examine whether focus is associated with increased operational performance, as measured by patient enrollment across a given trial. After controlling for selection, scale, and learning effects, we find that sites that focus on performing clinical trials significantly outperform those that mix trial activity with the provision of traditional patient care. Diversified sites that separate clinical trial activity and traditional patient care through a "plant-within-a-plant" structure achieve performance that is statistically equivalent to that of a fully focused site dedicated solely to clinical trials. Finally, we find that sites characterized by focus only at the level of front-line production workers experience similar benefits to those characterized by focus only at the level of management.

[1]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Impact of Plant Size and Focus on Productivity: An Empirical Study , 1996 .

[2]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q , 1988 .

[3]  D B Rubin,et al.  Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Robert Johnston,et al.  Achieving Focus in Service Organisations , 1996 .

[5]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[6]  William A Ghali,et al.  Multiple imputation versus data enhancement for dealing with missing data in observational health care outcome analyses. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[8]  G. King,et al.  Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[9]  P. Blau A FORMAL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1970 .

[10]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research , 2000 .

[11]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[12]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[13]  D. Upton Process range in manufacturing: an empirical study of flexibility , 1997 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[15]  Vojislav Maksimovic,et al.  Do Conglomerate Firms Allocate Resources Inefficiently Across Industries? Theory and Evidence , 2002 .

[16]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale in R&D: Agency Problems and the Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Firm Size , 1994 .

[17]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[18]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  Strategy, uncertainty and the focused factory in international process manufacturing , 2006 .

[19]  E. Ofek,et al.  Diversification's effect on firm value , 1995 .

[20]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale and scope in drug development: unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[21]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series , 2004 .

[22]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[23]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[24]  F. B. Talbot,et al.  The impact of new manufacturing requirements on production line productivity and quality at a focused factory , 2000 .

[25]  Alice M. Sapienza,et al.  Market Driven Health Care , 1998 .

[26]  Curtis P. McLaughlin,et al.  Professional Service Organizations and Focus , 1995 .

[27]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[28]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[29]  J. March The Business Firm as a Political Coalition , 1962, The Journal of Politics.

[30]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Julio J. Rotemberg Process- Versus Function-Based Hierarchies , 1999 .

[32]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[33]  A. Smart Operations, Strategy, and Technology: Pursuing the Competitive Edge , 2006 .

[34]  J. Graham,et al.  Does Corporate Diversification Destroy Value? , 2001 .

[35]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[36]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[37]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[38]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[39]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study Of Intra-Industry Focus Effects: INTRA-INDUSTRY FOCUS EFFECTS , 2003 .

[40]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly , 1996, Oper. Res..

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[42]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[43]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study of Intra-Industry Focus Effects , 1998 .

[44]  L. Reder,et al.  The Strategy-Specific Nature of Improvement: The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task , 1998 .

[45]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  Industrial De-Diversification and its Consequences for Productivity , 1990 .

[46]  Simi Kedia,et al.  Explaining the Diversification Discount , 1999 .

[47]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[48]  R. Hayes Restoring our competitive edge , 1984 .

[49]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Product Mix Characteristics on Capacity Management Decisions and Operating Performance , 2001 .

[50]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[51]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Specialization and Success: Evidence from Venture Capital , 2009 .

[52]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[53]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[54]  R. Rettig The industrialization of clinical research. , 2000, Health affairs.

[55]  Nikos Tsikriktsis,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves for Customer Dissatisfaction: Heterogeneity Across Airlines , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning: Evidence from the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  The impact of market requirements focus and manufacturing characteristics focus on plant performance , 1997 .

[58]  James L. Heskett,et al.  Managing in the service economy , 1986 .

[59]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .