Multimodality localization of epileptic foci

This paper presents a multimodality approach for the localization of epileptic foci using PET, MRI and EEG combined without the need of external markers. Mutual Information algorithm is used for MRI-PET registration. Dipole coordinates (provided by BESA software) are projected onto the MRI using a specifically developed algorithm. The four anatomical references used for electrode positioning (nasion, inion and two preauricular points) are located on the MRI using a triplanar viewer combined with a surface-rendering tool. Geometric transformation using deformation of the ideal sphere used for dipole calculations is then applied to match the patient's brain size and shape. Eight treatment-refractory epileptic patients have been studied. The combination of the anatomical information from the MRI, hipoperfusion areas in PET and dipole position and orientation helped the physician in the diagnosis of epileptic focus location. Neurosurgery was not indicated for patients where PET and dipole results were inconsistent; in two cases it was clinically indicated despite the mismatch, showing a negative follow up. The multimodality approach presented does not require external markers for dipole projection onto the MRI, this being the main difference with previous methods. The proposed method may play an important role in the indication of surgery for treatment- refractory epileptic patients.

[1]  K. K. Tan,et al.  The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[3]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[4]  F Mauguière,et al.  Source propagation of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Correlations between spike dipole modelling and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET data. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  C. Jack,et al.  Determination of 10-20 system electrode locations using magnetic resonance image scanning with markers. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J R Ives,et al.  3D localization of surface 10-20 EEG electrodes on high resolution anatomical MR images. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  E Rodin,et al.  Displaying Electroencephalographic Dipole Sources on Magnetic Resonance Images , 1997, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[9]  T W Picton,et al.  Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[10]  J Sijbers,et al.  Automatic localization of EEG electrode markers within 3D MR data. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  V Diekmann,et al.  Localisation of epileptic foci with electric, magnetic and combined electromagnetic models. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  I. Merlet,et al.  Simplified projection of EEG dipole sources onto human brain anatomy , 1999, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  B. N. Cuffin,et al.  Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  S. Sato,et al.  How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  B. N. Cuffin,et al.  Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.