The effect of normal force and roughness on friction in human finger contact

Abstract The relationship between normal force and friction force for a finger contacting a surface was examined, and also the effect of surface roughness, using a finger friction rig. To investigate the normal force–friction force relationship 12 materials were used: 3 metals, 5 plastics and 4 elastomers. Forty tests were carried out across a range of loads, for each material. The roughness tests were run on three metals (brass, steel and aluminium), with a range of surface roughness. The deformation of the finger was also monitored in the normal force tests using a high-speed video camera. The finger tested, reached a maximum area of contact at a low load: 1 N. Therefore, for forces above 1 N, the main friction mechanism was adhesion. The plateau in contact area and dominance of adhesion resulted in a linear relationship between normal force and friction force, for all loads above 1 N. The roughness tests showed that at a low surface roughness the finger dominates the interaction, so little difference is seen between materials and roughness. However, as the roughness increases the friction increases linearly, up to a point. At this point the friction does not vary as the width and height of the surface ridges are increased.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Matt Carré,et al.  Review of the frictional properties of finger-object contact when gripping , 2007 .

[3]  Imin Kao,et al.  Modeling of Contact Mechanics and Friction Limit Surfaces for Soft Fingers in Robotics, with Experimental Results , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Koudine,et al.  Frictional properties of skin: proposal of a new approach , 2000, International journal of cosmetic science.

[5]  S. J. Calabrese,et al.  Some parameters affecting tactile friction , 1991 .

[6]  Sadao Kawamura,et al.  Analysis of friction on human fingers and design of artificial fingers , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Firoz Alam,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Sport II , 2007 .

[8]  Joe Langley,et al.  Finger friction: Grip and opening packaging , 2007 .

[9]  O Bobjer,et al.  Friction between hand and handle. Effects of oil and lard on textured and non-textured surfaces; perception of discomfort. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  B Henson,et al.  Human tactile perception of screen-printed surfaces: Self-report and contact mechanics experiments , 2007 .

[11]  Roger Lewis,et al.  Improving the Understanding of Grip , 2007 .

[12]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Mechanisms for Age-Related Changes of Fingertip Forces during Precision Gripping and Lifting in Adults , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Comaish,et al.  THE SKIN AND FRICTION: DEVIATIONS FROM AMONTON'S LAWS, AND THE EFFECTS OF HYDRATION AND LUBRICATION , 1971, The British journal of dermatology.

[14]  Howard I Maibach,et al.  Friction coefficient of skin in real‐time , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[15]  H. Zahouani,et al.  Analysis of adhesive behaviour of human skin in vivo by an indentation test , 2006 .