Patterns in trash: Factors driving municipal recycling in Massachusetts

Abstract Municipal recycling rates are driven by a variety of factors. Yet how these factors influence recycling over time has not been thoroughly studied. We compile and analyze a panel dataset spanning 13-years of policy, program, and contextual (socioeconomic and demographic) variables for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. We find Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) to be the single most important factor influencing rates. In one time period, PAYT's effect varied by the type of recycling service (drop off, subscription, curbside) and increased recycling even more when paired with curbside pickup. Yet, across models, program designs that seek to make recycling more convenient, such as curbside pickup and single stream (the commingling of all recyclables in a single bin) are not as consistently beneficial as PAYT. Education level and median age are the most important contextual factors. Access to a Materials Recycling Facility is also an important driver of recycling rates. Our findings can inform municipal officials and waste managers as they seek to increase recycling.

[1]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  Household Responses to Price Incentives for Recycling: Some Further Evidence , 1999 .

[2]  Marta Batllevell,et al.  The fairness of PAYT systems: some guidelines for decision-makers. , 2008, Waste management.

[3]  David H. Folz,et al.  Public Participation and Recycling Performance: Explaining Program Success , 1991 .

[4]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Assessing Incentive‐Based Environmental Policies For Reducing Household Waste Disposal , 1998 .

[5]  Calvin Lakhan,et al.  Exploring the relationship between municipal promotion and education investments and recycling rate performance in Ontario, Canada , 2014 .

[6]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Analyzing Demand For Disposal And Recycling Services: A Systems Approach , 2006 .

[7]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  The Impact of State and Local Policies on the Recycling Effort , 1997 .

[8]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag , 1994 .

[9]  Michael J. Podolsky,et al.  Municipal Waste Disposal: Unit Pricing and Recycling Opportunities , 1998 .

[10]  Garrick E Louis.  A Historical Context of Municipal Solid Waste Management in the United States , 2004, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[11]  N. Goldstein,et al.  Urban facility delivers food waste composting capacity. , 2010 .

[12]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan case , 2001 .

[13]  Shaufique Fahmi Sidique,et al.  Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties , 2010 .

[14]  Philip H. Byer,et al.  EFFECT OF DESIGN VARIABLES ON PARTICIPATION IN RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAMS , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas C. Kinnaman.  Why do Municipalities Recycle? , 2005 .

[16]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[17]  David H. Folz.  Recycling Program Design, Management, and Participation: A National Survey of Municipal Experience , 1991 .

[18]  Martin V. Melosi.  GARBAGE IN THE CITIES: REFUSE, REFORM, AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1880-1980 , 1985, Landscape Journal.

[19]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy , 2000 .

[20]  Thomas C. Kinnaman.  Policy Watch: Examining the Justification for Residential Recycling , 2006 .

[21]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[22]  Nick Johnstone,et al.  Generation of Household Solid Waste in OECD Countries: An Empirical Analysis Using Macroeconomic Data , 2004, Land Economics.