Gaussian private quantum channel with squeezed coherent states

While the objective of conventional quantum key distribution (QKD) is to secretly generate and share the classical bits concealed in the form of maximally mixed quantum states, that of private quantum channel (PQC) is to secretly transmit individual quantum states concealed in the form of maximally mixed states using shared one-time pad and it is called Gaussian private quantum channel (GPQC) when the scheme is in the regime of continuous variables. We propose a GPQC enhanced with squeezed coherent states (GPQCwSC), which is a generalization of GPQC with coherent states only (GPQCo) [Phys. Rev. A 72, 042313 (2005)]. We show that GPQCwSC beats the GPQCo for the upper bound on accessible information. As a subsidiary example, it is shown that the squeezed states take an advantage over the coherent states against a beam splitting attack in a continuous variable QKD. It is also shown that a squeezing operation can be approximated as a superposition of two different displacement operations in the small squeezing regime.

[1]  A. Harrow,et al.  Superdense coding of quantum states. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[2]  P. L. Knight,et al.  Entanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a prerequisite for entanglement , 2002 .

[3]  C. Caves Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[4]  M. Hillery Quantum cryptography with squeezed states , 1999, quant-ph/9909006.

[5]  Paulina Marian,et al.  Quantifying nonclassicality of one-mode Gaussian states of the radiation field. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[6]  Jan Bouda,et al.  Optimality of private quantum channels , 2007, 0710.2004.

[7]  Dong Pyo Chi,et al.  Approximate quantum state sharing via two private quantum channels , 2010, 1011.3297.

[8]  Z. Y. Ou,et al.  Security improvement by using a modified coherent state for quantum cryptography , 2005 .

[9]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  M. Hastings Superadditivity of communication capacity using entangled inputs , 2009 .

[11]  Marco G. Genoni,et al.  Quantifying non-Gaussianity for quantum information , 2010, 1008.4243.

[12]  Andreas J. Winter,et al.  Counterexamples to the Maximal p-Norm Multiplicativity Conjecture for all p > 1 , 2008, ArXiv.

[13]  Paul A. Dickinson,et al.  Approximate Randomization of Quantum States With Fewer Bits of Key , 2006, quant-ph/0611033.

[14]  Maira Amezcua,et al.  Quantum Optics , 2012 .

[15]  Krishna Kumar Sabapathy,et al.  Robustness of non-Gaussian entanglement against noisy amplifier and attenuator environments. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[16]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Direct and reverse secret-key capacities of a quantum channel. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[17]  T. Ralph,et al.  Continuous variable quantum cryptography , 1999, quant-ph/9907073.

[18]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Private quantum channels , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[19]  Zheng-Fu Han,et al.  Decoy state quantum key distribution with modified coherent state , 2007, 0704.3833.

[20]  V. V. Dodonov,et al.  ENERGY-SENSITIVE AND CLASSICAL-LIKE' DISTANCES BETWEEN QUANTUM STATES , 1999 .

[21]  N. Cerf,et al.  Quantum distribution of Gaussian keys using squeezed states , 2000, quant-ph/0008058.

[22]  W. Vogel,et al.  Quantum Optics: VOGEL: QUANTUM OPTICS O-BK , 2006 .

[23]  Tombesi,et al.  Distinguishable quantum states generated via nonlinear birefringence. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[24]  Kamil Bradler Continuous-variable private quantum channel , 2005 .

[25]  Su-Yong Lee,et al.  Efficient entanglement criteria beyond Gaussian limits using Gaussian measurements. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[26]  S. Guha,et al.  Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  N. Cerf,et al.  Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Jaehak Lee,et al.  Comment on "Role of initial entanglement and non-Gaussianity in the decoherence of photon-number entangled states evolving in a noisy channel". , 2011, Physical review letters.

[29]  Yurke,et al.  Quantum behavior of a four-wave mixer operated in a nonlinear regime. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[30]  Guillaume Aubrun On Almost Randomizing Channels with a Short Kraus Decomposition , 2008, 0805.2900.

[31]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[32]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[33]  Timothy C. Ralph Security of continuous-variable quantum cryptography , 2000 .

[34]  A. I. Lvovsky,et al.  Synthesis and tomographic characterization of the displaced Fock state of light , 2002 .

[35]  Christopher C. Gerry,et al.  GENERATION OF OPTICAL MACROSCOPIC QUANTUM SUPERPOSITION STATES VIA STATE REDUCTION WITH A MACH-ZEHNDER INTERFEROMETER CONTAINING A KERR MEDIUM , 1999 .

[36]  A. Winter,et al.  Randomizing Quantum States: Constructions and Applications , 2003, quant-ph/0307104.

[37]  A. Winter,et al.  Private capacity of quantum channels is not additive. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[38]  John Preskill,et al.  Secure quantum key distribution using squeezed states , 2001 .

[39]  Iordanis Kerenidis,et al.  On the optimality of quantum encryption schemes , 2006 .

[40]  Stephen M. Barnett,et al.  Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics , 1997 .