A topography‐based scaling algorithm for soil hydraulic parameters at hillslope scales: Field testing

[1] Soil hydraulic parameters were upscaled from a 30 m resolution to a 1 km resolution using a new aggregation scheme (described in the companion paper) where the scale parameter was based on the topography. When soil hydraulic parameter aggregation or upscaling schemes ignore the effect of topography, their application becomes limited at hillslope scales and beyond, where topography plays a dominant role in soil deposition and formation. Hence the new upscaling algorithm was tested at the hillslope scale (1 km) across two locations: (1) the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma, and (2) the Walnut Creek watershed in Iowa. The watersheds were divided into pixels of 1 km resolution and the effective soil hydraulic parameters obtained for each pixel. Each pixel/domain was then simulated using the physically based HYDRUS-3-D modeling platform. In order to account for the surface (runoff/on) and subsurface fluxes between pixels, an algorithm to route infiltration-excess runoff onto downstream pixels at daily time steps and to update the soil moisture states of the downstream pixels was applied. Simulated soil moisture states were compared across scales, and the coarse scale values compared against the airborne soil moisture data products obtained during the hydrology experiment field campaign periods (SGP97 and SMEX02) for selected pixels with different topographic complexities, soil distributions, and land cover. Results from these comparisons show good correlations between simulated and observed soil moisture states across time, topographic variations, location, elevation, and land cover. Stream discharge comparisons made at two gauging stations in the Little Washita watershed also provide reasonably good results as to the suitability of the upscaling algorithm used. Based only on the topography of the domain, the new upscaling algorithm was able to provide coarse resolution values for soil hydraulic parameters which effectively captured the variations in soil moisture across the watershed domains.

[1]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[2]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Analytical solutions for steady state vertical infiltration , 2002 .

[3]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention properties across a soil‐slope transition , 2000 .

[4]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices , 1999 .

[5]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Upscaling of Hydraulic Properties of Heterogeneous Soils , 2003 .

[6]  P. C. Doraiswamya,et al.  Crop condition and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS , 2004 .

[7]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Spatial Averaging of van Genuchten Hydraulic Parameters for Steady‐State Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: A Numerical Study , 2002 .

[8]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Process controls on regional flood frequency: Coefficient of variation and basin scale , 1997 .

[9]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Effective scaling factor for transient infiltration in heterogeneous soils , 2006 .

[10]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Effective Hydraulic Parameters in Horizontally and Vertically Heterogeneous Soils for Steady-State Land-Atmosphere Interaction , 2007 .

[11]  D. Tarboton.  A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[12]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  The power average operator , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Introduction to soil physics , 1982 .

[14]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Soil Hydraulic Parameter Upscaling for Steady-State Flow with Root Water Uptake , 2004 .

[15]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Remote sensing field experiments evaluate retrieval algorithms and land-atmosphere modeling , 2003 .

[16]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Topographical influences on soil properties in boreal forests , 2007 .

[17]  Douglas Alan Miller,et al.  Soil property database: Southern Great Plains 1997 Hydrology Experiment , 2002 .

[18]  T. Harter,et al.  Upscaling Hydraulic Properties and Soil Water Flow Processes in Heterogeneous Soils: A Review , 2007 .

[19]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas , 1998 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[21]  Peter Engesgaard,et al.  Contaminant Transport at a Waste Residue Deposit: 2. Geochemical Transport Modeling , 1996 .

[22]  T. Jackson,et al.  Field observations of soil moisture variability across scales , 2008 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Distributed Hydrological Modelling , 1998 .

[24]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Upscaling of soil hydraulic properties for steady state evaporation and infiltration , 2002 .

[25]  J. C. van Dam,et al.  Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation , 2000 .

[26]  Kaoru Takara,et al.  A downscaling method of topographic index distribution for matching the scales of model application and parameter identification , 2006 .

[27]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Simulation of the Atmospheric Circulation Using the NCAR Global Circulation Model with Ice Age Boundary Conditions , 1974 .

[28]  Warren J. Busscher,et al.  Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield , 1980 .

[29]  T. Jackson,et al.  Surface soil moisture variation on small agricultural watersheds , 1983 .

[30]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Soil moisture mapping at regional scales using microwave radiometry: the Southern Great Plains Hydrology Experiment , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  M. Schaap,et al.  ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions , 2001 .

[32]  Fred L. Ogden,et al.  Appropriate vertical discretization of Richards' equation for two‐dimensional watershed‐scale modelling , 2004 .

[33]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  Identifying and quantifying sources of variability in temporal and spatial soil moisture observations , 2004 .

[34]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  On the Effective Averaging Schemes of Hydraulic Properties at the Landscape Scale , 2006 .

[35]  A. Warrick,et al.  Correspondence and Upscaling of Hydraulic Functions for Steady‐State Flow in Heterogeneous Soils , 2004 .

[36]  K. Beven,et al.  Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments , 1984 .

[37]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  CONCEPTS OF SCALE AND SCALING , 2006 .

[38]  Eni G. Njoku,et al.  A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for upscaled soil‐vegetation‐atmosphere‐transfer modeling to evaluate satellite‐based soil moisture measurements , 2008 .

[39]  E. Eltahir,et al.  Stochastic analysis of the relationship between topography and the spatial distribution of soil moisture , 1998 .

[40]  E. E. Miller,et al.  Physical Theory for Capillary Flow Phenomena , 1956 .

[41]  M. Helmers,et al.  Effects of subsurface drainage tiles on streamflow in Iowa agricultural watersheds: Exploratory hydrograph analysis , 2008 .

[42]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Crop condition and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS , 2004 .

[43]  Raghavendra B. Jana,et al.  On topographic controls of soil hydraulic parameter scaling at hillslope scales , 2012 .