Data-Based Forest Management with Uncertainties and Multiple Objectives

In this paper, we present an approach of employing multiobjective optimization to support decision making in forest management planning. The planning is based on data representing so-called stands, each consisting of homogeneous parts of the forest, and simulations of how the trees grow in the stands under different treatment options. Forest planning concerns future decisions to be made that include uncertainty. We employ as objective functions both the expected values of incomes and biodiversity as well as the value at risk for both of these objectives. In addition, we minimize the risk level for both the income value and the biodiversity value. There is a tradeoff between the expected value and the value at risk, as well as between the value at risk of the two objectives of interest and, thus, decision support is needed to find the best balance between the conflicting objectives. We employ an interactive method where a decision maker iteratively provides preference information to find the most preferred management plan and at the same time learns about the interdependencies of the objectives.

[1]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Operationalization of biological diversity as a decision objective in tactical forest planning , 1996 .

[2]  A. Wierzbicki On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems , 1986 .

[3]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Behavioral Issues in MCDM: Neglected Research Questions , 1996 .

[4]  Kyle Eyvindson,et al.  Implementing the conditional value at risk approach for even-flow forest management planning , 2016 .

[5]  D. Duffie,et al.  An Overview of Value at Risk , 1997 .

[6]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Integrating risk preferences in forest harvest scheduling , 2015, Annals of Forest Science.

[7]  A. Kangas,et al.  Decision Support for Forest Management , 2008, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[8]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Evaluating the required scenario set size for stochastic programming in forest management planning: incorporating inventory and growth model uncertainty , 2016 .

[9]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[10]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[11]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  The Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Discrete Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[12]  Antti Mäkinen,et al.  SIMO: An adaptable simulation framework for multiscale forest resource data , 2009 .

[13]  Tero Heinonen,et al.  Habitat suitability models of saproxylic red-listed boreal forest species in long-term matrix management: Cost-effective measures for multi-species conservation , 2007 .

[14]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive Approaches , 2008, Multiobjective Optimization.

[15]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Correlations, distributions, and trends in forest inventory errors and their effects on forest planning , 2010 .

[16]  Antti Ihalainen,et al.  Keski-Suomen metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat ja niiden kehitys 1967–96 , 1970 .

[17]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Solving Hierarchical Stochastic Programs: Application to the Maritime Fleet Renewal Problem , 2015, INFORMS J. Comput..

[18]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  Reference Point Approaches , 1999 .