A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

Traditional data envelopment analysis has been applied to many areas to evaluate the relative efficiency of decision making units and it takes the internal structure of system as a “black box”. Recently, many two-stage DEA models are built to open up the “black box” of a two-stage system, where the outputs of the first stage are taken as the inputs for the second stage. By applying the two-stage DEA, more inefficiency in the system can be measured. The overall efficiency and divisional efficiencies of DMUs can be simultaneously obtained. Although some works take measures to decompose the overall efficiency into two divisional efficiencies, few works consider the competition between two stages because one stage has larger efficiency value and the other one will have smaller value. More importantly, in previous decomposition works, there are few works considering a DMU’s individual performance among its homogenous divisions. Based on the difference between two divisional performance (reference ratio), in this paper, a new model with fairness is proposed to decompose the overall efficiency and further applied to measure Chinese commercial banks’ performance from both the individual and overall perspectives.

[1]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[3]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Shiang-Tai Liu A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[11]  William L. Weber,et al.  A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency , 2009 .

[12]  Liang Liang,et al.  Internal resource waste and centralization degree in two-stage systems: An efficiency analysis , 2016 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  A unified classification of two-stage DEA models , 2014 .

[17]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A new two-stage Stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model , 2014 .

[18]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[20]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[21]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[22]  George Emm. Halkos,et al.  Weight assurance region in two-stage additive efficiency decomposition DEA model: an application to school data , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  K. Matthews Risk Management and Managerial Efficiency in Chinese Banks: A Network DEA Framework , 2011 .

[24]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of NBA teams: additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[25]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[26]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis : a handbook of models and methods , 2015 .

[27]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[28]  Qingxian An,et al.  Allocation of carbon dioxide emission permits with the minimum cost for Chinese provinces in big data environment , 2017 .

[29]  Jie Wu,et al.  Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jie Wu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Jie Wu,et al.  Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA , 2014 .

[33]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[34]  Sheng Ang,et al.  Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model ☆ , 2016 .