Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry

Given that extravagant secondary sexual characters, i. e. ornaments, give males a mating advantage through male-male competition or female choice, all males should benefit from growing very large ornaments. If sexual characters are to function as reliable advertisements of male quality, there must be a limit for males in their ability to grow or maintain large ornaments because of associated fitness costs, which may be more prominent in low than in high quality individuals. I used fluctuating asymmetry in ornament size as a measure of the ability of individuals to achieve identical development of the ornament on both sides of their body. Long-tailed males of the sexually size dimorphic swallow Hirundo rustica had less asymmetrical tails than had shorter-tailed individuals. The cost of fluctuating asymmetry in tail size in terms of manoeuvrability during flight was estimated directly by manipulating the degree of asymmetry and thereafter recording the number of times swallows hit semi-partitions in a flight cage. Both the degree of asymmetry caused by experimental treatment as well as the natural degree of asymmetry negatively affected manoeuvrability during flight, suggesting that asymmetry per se and inherent differences between individuals affected their flight performance. Female mate choice may be optimized by relying on fluctuating asymmetry in male ornaments, such as the tails of male swallows, being likely to reflect individual properties of direct fitness value.

[1]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[2]  Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow , 1989 .

[3]  M. Andersson,et al.  Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement , 1982 .

[4]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  A. Møller,et al.  Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow , 1988, Nature.

[6]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns , 1986 .

[7]  M. Andersson Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[8]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  James H. Brown,et al.  Truth in Advertising: The Kinds of Traits Favored by Sexual Selection , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .

[11]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: Implications for conservation biology. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Perceived risk and obstacle avoidance in flying birds , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A STUDY OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY , 1962 .

[15]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[16]  Oren Hasson,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle , 1984 .

[17]  S. Freeman,et al.  Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size , 1990 .