Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control.

Restricted stimulus control refers to discrimination learning with atypical limitations in the range of controlling stimuli or stimulus features. In the study reported here, 4 normally capable individuals and 10 individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) performed two-sample delayed matching to sample. Sample-stimulus observing was recorded with an eye-tracking apparatus. High accuracy scores indicated stimulus control by both sample stimuli for the 4 nondisabled participants and 4 participants with ID, and eye tracking data showed reliable observing of all stimuli. Intermediate accuracy scores indicated restricted stimulus control for the remaining 6 participants. Their eye-tracking data showed that errors were related to failures to observe sample stimuli and relatively brief observing durations. Five of these participants were then given interventions designed to improve observing behavior. For 4 participants, the interventions resulted initially in elimination of observing failures, increased observing durations, and increased accuracy. For 2 of these participants, contingencies sufficient to maintain adequate observing were not always sufficient to maintain high accuracy; subsequent procedure modifications restored it, however. For the 5th participant, initial improvements in observing were not accompanied by improved accuracy, an apparent instance of observing without attending; accuracy improved only after an additional intervention that imposed contingencies on observing behavior. Thus, interventions that control observing behavior seem necessary but may not always be sufficient for the remediation of restricted stimulus control.

[1]  P. Reed,et al.  Age trends in stimulus overselectivity. , 2007, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  Toby L. Martin,et al.  Predicting learning ability of people with intellectual disabilities: assessment of basic learning abilities test versus caregivers' predictions. , 2007, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[3]  W. V. Dube,et al.  Overselective stimulus control in residential school students with intellectual disabilities. , 2006, Research in developmental disabilities.

[4]  L. Balsamo,et al.  Observing Behavior Topography in Delayed Matching to Multiple Samples , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew K Belmonte,et al.  Functional anatomy of impaired selective attention and compensatory processing in autism. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Eric Courchesne,et al.  Differential effects of developmental cerebellar abnormality on cognitive and motor functions in the cerebellum: an fMRI study of autism. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  T. Callahan,et al.  High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  W. V. Dube,et al.  Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. , 1999, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  W. V. Dube,et al.  Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  W. V. Dube,et al.  Stimulus-Reinforcer Relations and Emergent Matching to Sample , 1995 .

[11]  J. Theeuwes Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.

[12]  William J. McIlvane,et al.  Microcomputer-based programmed instruction in identity matching to sample for persons with severe disabilities , 1992 .

[13]  W. Bickel,et al.  A Microanalysis of the Controlling Stimulus-Response Relations Engendered During the Assessment of Stimulus Overselectivity , 1986 .

[14]  J. Dinsmoor The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  L. Schreibman,et al.  Stimulus overselectivity in autism: a review of research. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  A. Litrownik,et al.  Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  L. Schreibman Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. , 1975, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  M Sidman,et al.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  Anne Scott,et al.  International review of research in mental retardation , 1969 .

[20]  G S REYNOLDS,et al.  Attention in the pigeon. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  P. Howlin,et al.  Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism. , 2009, American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[22]  A. L. Egel,et al.  Stimulus Overselectivity and Generative Language Instruction for Students with Autism: An Issue That Needs to Be Revisited , 2001 .

[23]  S. Yantis 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[24]  M. Perone,et al.  Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  G. Lancioni,et al.  Procedures and Parameters of Errorless Discrimination Training with Developmentally Impaired Individuals , 1986 .

[26]  Murray Sidman,et al.  Programming Perception and Learning for Retarded Children , 1966 .